About Me

Name: Cary Wesberry
Email: carywesberry@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Russia's Nuclear Arsenal, 10 Times Greater Than Our Own

From "Putin's Next Domino" by Kathy Shaidle writing at Front Page Magazine:
As soon as the U.S. and Poland signed their long awaited missile defense pact on August 20 (a deal recently reported in FrontPage), the Kremlin issued a sinister threat reminiscent of its old Cold War rhetoric.

The deal places 10 missile defense interceptors on Polish territory, 115 miles from the Russian border. The missiles are designed to deter and, if necessary, defeat an Iranian attack, not to attack the former Soviet Union. But the Russians don't believe that.

Hours after the signing, Russia's Foreign Ministry described the new base as "one of the instruments in an extremely dangerous bundle of American military projects involving the one-sided development of a global missile shield system." The Foreign Ministry insisted that the interceptors don't have "any target other than Russian intercontinental ballistic missiles," and issued a veiled threat: "In this case Russia will be forced to react, and not only through diplomatic" channels.

A few days earlier, Deputy Chief of Staff General Anatoly Nogovitsyn had warned, "Poland, by deploying [the system] is exposing itself to [nuclear] attack, one hundred percent."

Earlier, the chief of Russia's strategic missile command suggested aiming nuclear missiles at Poland, while Vladimir Putin himself has warned Poland's neighbor that "Russia will have to point its warheads at Ukrainian territory" if Ukraine joined NATO.

In Poland to sign the aggreement, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice dismissed any suggestion that the new system represents a threat to Russia, and denounced General Nogovitsyn's threat.

Comments like this "border on the bizarre, frankly," said Rice, adding, "The Russians are losing their credibility." "Missile defense, of course, is aimed at no one," Rice futher explained. "It is in our defense that we do this."

"It's also the case that when you threaten Poland, you perhaps forget that it is not 1988," Rice continued. "It's 2008 and the United States has a ... firm treaty guarantee to defend Poland's territory as if it was the territory of the United States. So it's probably not wise to throw these threats around."

Perhaps, but Russia seems eager to turn back the clock, to a time when it was the United States' most feared enemy, and not merely a nation among others.
Some strong language, thankfully, from Secretary of State Condi Rice towards our Russian enemies.  Her statement is an interesting reminder.  Unlike with Georgia, we do indeed have a treaty with Poland to defend their country as if it were our own.  A treaty I could not be in more support of. 
 
However, Russia possesses ten times the number of tactical nuclear missiles held by the United States.  5,000 of them to be exact.  For anyone just now discovering this fact, the situation should have just gotten a great deal more serious.  Especially considering Russia's alignment with Iran, Syria, Venezuela, and now Cuba.
 
The good news is Vlad the Impaler Putin must realize, evil though he is, that even with all those nuclear missiles there is no way Russia could defeat the United States in a war.  Russia cannot fire all 5,000 nuclear missiles at the same time.  The vast majority, if not all of them, would be destroyed well before hitting their targets if launched.  Operational nukes or not, Russia would be obliterated in a nuclear confrontation with America.  Our defense capabilities far outweigh anything Russia is capable of.  While their nuclear missiles are destroyed before detonation, U.S. missiles would be striking their targets and throwing Russia back to the Dark Ages in short order.
 
So for all of Moscow's propaganda, and as truly serious as their nuclear arsenal is, we are hardly faced with a direct threat from a Russian nuclear attack.  Poland and Ukraine on the other hand, have every right to be worried and do whatever they can to defend themselves from any attacks; whether they be from Russia or Iran as Secretary Rice suggests.
 
I believe her by the way.  Secretary Rice is correct; Poland entering our missile defense net is directly aimed at Iran, not Russia.  Right now the Kremlin will use any excuse it has to throw focus and blame away from them and onto other countries as agitators.  After their invasion of Georgia this is to be expected.
 
A sidenote to this article:  Russia would not have such a greater number of tactical nuclear missiles than we do if not for Democrats destroying America's military budget and wadging their own personal war against our nuclear weapons capability.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. Marines Ensuring Victory in Iraq

From Lance Cpl. Scott Schmidt, Regimental Combat Team 1, writing at Family Security Matters on our amazing progress and victory in Iraq:
Since June 28, 2004, when the Coalition Provisional Authority officially transferred sovereignty to the Iraqi Interim Government, Marines have done their part to assist the Iraqi people in building a unified Iraq with the political and economic stability needed to govern itself.

Marines with Task Force 1st Battalion, 2nd Marine Regiment, Regimental Combat Team 1, have hit the sands of Camp Habbaniyah with a passion for their mission. The battalion officially took control of the area from 2nd Battalion, 24th Marine Regiment, Aug. 10.

Inheriting an area of operations in an increasingly peaceful Iraq, 1st Battalion, 2nd Marines will conduct partnered operations and build civic and Iraqi Security Force capabilities to enable a self-reliant and legitimate local security and government apparatus that facilitates transition and provincial Iraqi control.

“We want to see the Iraqis put their face on the mission while we are here to provide over-watch and reassure them they are doing right,” explained Staff Sgt. Issac Sato, a platoon sergeant with the battalion’s Quick Reaction Force.

Taking the reins from their predecessor of the area, 1st Bn., 2nd Marines are working hand-in-hand with the Iraqi Army, Iraqi Police and the civilian populace to improve the quality of life.

The steps the Iraqi people are taking, with the help of Marines, are crucial because, “With Saddam gone and violence down, the Iraqis want their own country and in order to do that they have to take the lead,” said Sato.

Marines have trained across the whole spectrum of warfare, from high intensity conflict to the complex nature of a counter insurgency environment. But now the Marines of 1st Battalion, 2d Marines are helping Iraqis help themselves to improve their infrastructure and develop governance and security at the local level.

“The cohesion and camaraderie, in addition to training, has prepared the leadership as well as the individual Marine to successfully complete every mission,” said Maj. Gordon Miller, the battalion’s executive officer.

Miller stressed the importance of building a unified community by working with the people for security, governance and essential services. “Success will come when Iraqis handle everything themselves,” he said.

Marines and their Iraqi brethren have the “knowledge, skill and will to make it happen,” said Miller.
U.S. Marines achieve victory and results the old fashioned way.  By working for it and refusing to settle for defeat.  Major Gordon Miller is exactly right; and success has come.  Iraq has reached a point, thanks to our amazing Military, that it would take a complete idiot Hell-bent on failure to make a 180-degree turn from where we are today.  Yet another reason to keep the Democrats out of the White House:  Americans prefer to win.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Spear-Wielding Islamists Storm Christian School in Indonesia

It appears Indonesia's "tradition of religious tolerance" is a thing of the past:
JAKARTA, Indonesia — Hundreds of Christian theology students have been living in tents since a mob of angry Muslim neighbors stormed their campus last month wielding bamboo spears and hurling Molotov cocktails.

The incident comes amid growing concern that Indonesia's tradition of religious tolerance is under threat from Islamic hard-liners.

In talks since the attack, the Arastamar Evangelical School of Theology has reluctantly agreed to shut its 20-year-old campus in east Jakarta, accepting an offer this week to move to a small office building on the other side of the Indonesian capital.

"Why should we be forced from our house while our attackers can walk freely?" asked the Rev. Matheus Mangentang, chairman of the 1,400-student school.

The government of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono, which relies on the support of Islamic parties in Parliament, is struggling to balance deep Islamic traditions and a secular constitution. With elections coming next April, the government seems unwilling to defend religious minorities, lest it be portrayed as anti-Islamic in what is the world's most populous Muslim-majority country.
It is what they do folks.  The Reverand and Chairman of the Christian school can probably stop holding his breath for the Indonesian government to put a stop to the attacks.  Their secular constitution will be a short-lived document, likely burned by the same Molotav cocktails the Islamists used to drive the Christian students from their school.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Dog Does What Barack Obama Will Not

That's right, a filthy stinking dog will do for a newborn baby what Barack Obama will not, keep the child alive who has been abandoned by its mother... much like a child being born then abandoned by its mother for death through a failed abortion.  Are we down to your "pay grade" yet Barack?
A newborn baby that was abandoned outdoors by her 14-year-old mother during the Argentina winter was found safe Thursday after being kept alive and warm by a mother dog and her brood of puppies, Reuters reported.

Farmer Fabio Anze found the naked baby near the city of La Plata, Argentina, lying amongst his dog China’s puppies. The baby was taken to the hospital after Anze called the authorities.

Hospital officials said the baby was only a few hours old when she was found, and was in good health despite several bruises.

Temperatures at night around La Plata, 40 miles south of Buenos Aires, this time of year are cold, but not freezing.

Police have located the 14-year-old mother. It is not known whether she left her baby in the dog's pen or whether the dog found the baby outdoors and carried it in to join her puppies, Reuters reported.
Dogs in Argentina care about newborn children more than Barack Obama.  So much more in fact, that the dogs actually keep the newborns alive where Barack would kill them or allow them to die in a box.  When you support Barack Obama, this is the sort of sick human being you are voting for.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why Isn't Barack Obama Winning the Election?

From Gerard Baker writing at the Times Online:
There's trouble in paradise. Cancel the coronation. Send back the commemorative medals. Put those “Yes We Can” T-shirts up on eBay. Keep the Change.

Barack Obama's historic procession to the American presidency has been rudely interrupted. The global healing he promised is in jeopardy. If you're prone to emotional breakdown, you might want to take a seat before I say this. He might not win.

How can it be, you ask? Didn't we see him just last month speaking to 200,000 adoring Germans in Berlin? Didn't he get the red carpet treatment in France - France of all places? Doesn't every British politician want to be seen clutching the hem of his garment?

All true. But as cruel geography and the selfish designs of the American Founding Fathers would have it, Europeans don't get to choose the US president. Somewhere along the way to the Obama presidency, somebody forgot to ask the American people.

And wouldn't you know it, they insist on looking this gift thoroughbred in the mouth. Who'd have thought it? You present them with the man who deigns to deliver them from their plight and they want to sit around and ask hard questions about who he is and what he believes and where he might actually take the country. The ingrates!

So we arrive this weekend at the true starting line of the US presidential race and the rituals that begin the real election campaign: the selection of the vice-presidential running-mates, and the back-to-back party nominating conventions. A year and a half after the warm-ups began, the two remaining candidates are more or less tied. Senator Obama's summer lead in the opinion polls has evaporated. John McCain, that grumpy, grisly, gnarled old Republican, that Gollum to Senator Obama's Bilbo Baggins, might, just might, actually win this thing.

What happened?

Of course, the conventional view is that it's all the work of that most terrifyingly effective piece of artillery since the invention of the howitzer, the Republican Attack Machine.

The credulous American voter, we're told, has been subjected in the last month to a televised blitzkrieg of right-wing lies about the hapless Democrat. He's not patriotic. He might be a Muslim. He might not even be American. He probably is a Muslim. There's no evidence he's ever said anything nice about Michael Phelps. He goes to the mosque on Fridays. If Obama's the leader of the free world, it won't be the Caucasian Georgia the Russians invade but the one sandwiched between Florida and South Carolina. Gullible Americans are going to fall for it, just as they fell for Stupid George W over Brilliant Al Gore and Brave John Kerry. 

Forgive me for interrupting this reverie but in the real world something else is going on.
Gerard Baker nails it again!  Continue reading his excellent column by following the link above.  Yes, regardless of all the help Obama has gotten from the mainstream media and the final rush of Superdelegates at the end of the Democrat primaries, our own world-renowned community agitator from Chicago is still unable to close the deal in this election.
 
He already has the media, and there really isn't much more they can do for Obama besides giving their all to his campaign; and they are already fully committed.  No help from the party-elite Superdelegates now.  Those fools already did everything they could by handing him the nomination.  It's just him and McCain now, and the only thing that can tip the scales is each candidate's VP choice.
 
For Obama, the VP choice can either hurt him badly or possibly win him the election.  There are only two people who fall into that category however.  The rest of the gaggle of Democrat potentials will have zero effect. 
 
The one who will hurt Obama and practically give John McCain the Presidency is Senator Joe Biden.  As a well known fruitcake, Biden is held in contempt by most of America... meaning the vast majority of the nation which Democrats know as "fly-over country".  That includes the South.  Joe Biden is why the word "baffoon" was invented.  He is a living, breathing, walking bumbling idiot who touts some of the worst ideas and beliefs the United States has ever seen or heard.  I very much hope Barack Obama chooses Joe Biden as his running-mate.
 
The one who will help Obama the most and deliver to him the majority of Democrat voters (the same demographic that makes up the majority of Republican voters), white working class citizens, is Senator and former First Lady Hillary Clinton.  The same person who Barack Obama will do almost anything to not have to pick.  The huge rift between the two is still evident, and Obama knows full well that choosing Hillary will reward him with a co-Presidency for the duration of his incursion into the White House.  Giving Hillary the VP slot would put Obama's opponent at a disadvantage in the context of voter turn-out alone.  I very much hope Barack Obama does not choose Hillary Clinton as his running-mate.
 
The VP choice is about the only thing left for Obama in order to significantly pull ahead of McCain in the polls.  Knowing Obama's pride, especially when it comes to Hillary, his VP choice will most likely be a hindrance.  That brings us right back to why it is that Barack Obama, our New Messiah, is not winning the election.  His judgement and ideology.  The past few weeks have given the country shining examples of Obama's inability to make sensible decisions along with direct insight into his ultra-socialist and morally bankrupt beliefs.  Not only that, his character has clearly shown to be lacking greatly.  Barack's embarrassing trip to the Middle-East and Europe, the Russian invasion of Georgia, the forum at Rick Warren's church.  The real Obama is being shown to the voters and they are generally repulsed.  It's so bad his numbers are even dropping among liberals!
 
Barack Obama is not winning because he is Barack Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russian Invasion Force Swap-Out Taking Place in Georgia

From Tony Halpin in Natsreti, and Nico Hines writing for the Times Online:
Columns of Russian tanks were gathering on the road to Gori today as they appeared to be preparing for a mass withdrawal from the area.
 
Troops identified as peacekeepers, however, continued to man some checkpoints deep inside Georgia away from the agreed buffer zones where Russia is permitted to station its forces. The position of a checkpoint at Natsreti close to Gori raises questions about the extent of the security zone that Russia will continue to operate on Georgian soil.

The Times saw around 50 tanks and armed personnel carriers on the road between Gori and Tbilisi appearing to pulling out towards South Ossetia.

The strategically important road was apparently being vacated today with a checkpoint at Igoeti dismantled by this afternoon. Georgian police were standing at the side of the road watching the Russian Army leave the blockade around 40km outside Tbilisi. It is the closest the Georgian forces have been to Gori for over a week.

The troop movement came the day after President Medvedev of Russia said that only 500 soldiers would be left inside Georgia by the end of today.

He has repeatedly told the West that his forces would leave Georgia, but they so far failed to meet any of the deadlines that have been set.

The United States and the European Union are growing frustrated at Russia’s intransigence and suspicious of the Kremlin’s real motives.

A senior US military officer said in Tbilisi today that the withdrawal was “far too little, far too slow”.
It continues to be offensive and insulting to our intelligence for the Russians to describe their second invasion force as "peacekeepers".  If they were indeed peacekeepers, those troops would be on Russian soil caring for possible refugees instead of invading another sovereign country.  In fact, the Russians don't have a department, branch, or group of individuals known as "peacekeepers".  Russia has civilians, the Communist governing class, and the military.  This entire notion of them leaving a "peacekeeping force" on Georgian soil is a fabrication.
 
Russia's "peacekeepers" are the ones who started the invasion of Georgia in the first place!  What is worse than the constant lies coming out of the Kremlin is the civilized world, including our own country, allowing Russian control of Georgian territory.  The senior military officer from the United States quoted above by the Times Online is correct.  "Far too little, far too slow," and far too late for my taste. 
 
I will say it again and again; if this is how my country defends our allies who fight and die alongside our own soldiers then an alliance with the United States is worth less than the paper it was written on.  When an ally such as Georgia is attacked, we send blankets and cookies.  Our pathetic reaction does not even begin to address what Russia has done.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

260 "Recorded" Incursions by Mexican Military into the U.S. Since 1996; 43 Since October 2007

What you see quoted below is a response from the Department of Homeland Security and the Border Patrol to a unnamed high-ranking Senator who asked for answers concerning incursions across our border by the Mexican military. 

This was authenticated and released by my Congressman, John Culberson, so that you are made aware of the facts surrounding these incursions and our lack of national security along the southern border.
 
Apparently Mexico's sovereignty "does not stop at the Rio Grande":
The Tucson Incursion is currently being investigated by DHS/CBP and the Border Patrol. We will provide updates as the investigation continues and as new information is received. We are cooperating within our respective departments as well as with the Government of Mexico (GoM) to bring clarity and resolution to this matter. Below are a few points the Border Patrol would like to emphasize:

We are aware of an incident involving an apparent incursion by the Mexican military south of Ajo, Arizona.

All indications at this point show that there were in fact Mexican troops on US soil.

We also have no reason to doubt the story of the Border Patrol agent on the scene about the unnecessary show of force by the military.

We are actively investigating this incident with the Mexican government, as well as other agencies, in order to bring it to resolution.

There are some areas of the border where the boundary is indiscernible.

The addition of tactical infrastructure along the border clearly delineates that line as well as acts as persistent impedance to those crossing illegally into the Untied States.

Where this incident took place, there is a barbed-wire fence that marks the borderline as well as new tactical infrastructure within sight.

We are looking for corrective action by GoM to ensure that this in no way shape or form happens again and expect decisive, definitive action to make certain this isn't repeated.

We will not tolerate negligent and/or hostile actions perpetrated by Mexican military on our soil or on our agents protecting this nation.

Crossing into our country would be negligent, but the pointing of weapons or detaining our agent at gunpoint would be a hostile action.

This fiscal year, there have been 43 recorded incursions into the United States. Since 1996, there have been more than 260.
The last line directly above surely bears repeating.  43 recorded incursions by the Mexican military into the United States this fiscal year that we know of.  260 incursions into the United States by the Mexican military since 1996... again, that we know of.
 
The Department of Homeland Incompetence and Insecurity stated yesterday they have nothing to add to this update, so you know DHS is working extremely hard to maintain and enforce national security; especially during a time of war against an enemy who has already attacked America on our own soil killing thousands of civilians.  There is, under virtually any circumstance, no excuse for the poor performance of the money pit known as the Department of Homeland Security and its ineffective director, Michael Chertoff.
 
Corruption in Mexico's government makes our own Congress appear almost responsible, and their soldiers are often paid by various drug cartels to assist in smuggling slaves, terrorists, and illegal drugs into the United States.  By DHS/CBP's own admission, incursions by the Mexican military are occuring frequently and without resistence.  This affects you directly because your family and friends are significantly less secure from harm due to the inaction of those whose one and only job is to protect our country its people domestically.  In fact, the statement quoted above from DHS and the Border Patrol is the only response we are likely to see on this issue.
 
Michael Chertoff's plan to stop the incursions by the Mexican military is to "look for corrective action by the government of Mexico".  Instead of the Department of Homeland Security actually securing the homeland, they are going to plead with the Mexican government to do it for us.  That alone begs the question: how much exactly does this group of idiots get paid again? 
 
What you as an American Citizen needs to do is write, email, and/or call your Representatives and Senators to demand real and provable action be taken to stop the Mexican military from crossing into the United States without first obtaining our explicit permission to do so.  We have no need or desire for the Mexican military on United States soil.  Americans have our own Military and they are by far the best and most professional in all the world.  No one has requested assistence from the Mexican military for any reason, and each one of us should be demanding their incursions cease immediately.  Yet another example of why a portion of our own Military should be stationed on the southern border.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama the Whiner: McCain Cheated!

When McCain scored a knockout over Senator Obama the other night at the Saddleback Church in Orange County by answering Reverend Warren’s questions more confidently, clearly and decisively than the stumbling, obfuscating Obama, Obama’s campaign accused the Straight Talk Express of cheating. Whiners.

There is no evidence -- none -- that McCain heard Obama’s rambling and confusing answers prior to taking the stage and answering Reverend Warren’s questions. The evidence is pretty plain: when thrashed soundly by a superior opponent, the Obama camp whined like school girls.

The Obama camp, recognizing that McCain answered the questions in a more straightforward, presidential tone than their guy, immediately began complaining that McCain must have cheated by listening to Obama fumble his answers time and time again. Obama appeared like the freshman senator that he is.

The bottom line is this: McCain appeared much more presidential than Obama. And there is a very valid reason for this: as a natural leader, McCain is a far better choice than Obama, who is the guy with the least amount of experience in the history of presidential campaigns.

When Obama does not have a teleprompter in front of him to deliver another hollow message of transparent, symbolic hope and change, his speech and answers to questions are disjointed and confusing. Watch him closely. He is not confident.

Are you, like me, wondering how a President Obama would fair politically against determined adversaries such as Iranian psychopath Ahmadinejad, North Korea’s Littler Hitler, Kim Jong Il, or how he would navigate through political minefields such as the trade imbalance with China, Russian saber rattling which could lead to a new Cold War, etc.? Scary thought.
Read Ted Nugent's entire column by following the link above to Human Events.  President Barack Obama facing-off against Vlad the Impaler Putin, the Chi-Coms, Iran, and North Korea is indeed a "scary thought".  I would go so far as to say "horrifying". 
 
Whining is never Presidential.  So what did Barack Obama immediately do after the forum at Rick Warren's church last weekend when he realized how weak and empty his peformance was compared to John McCain's?  He whined.  Obama accused McCain of cheating.  How that in any way explains Obama's uninspiring and thoughtless answers to Warren's questions I do not know.  The fact is, whether or not McCain cheated (which he did not) has zero to do with Obama's pathetic performance.
 
Probably the two worst answers during the entire forum:  Obama's answer to confronting evil was to only give examples such as abusive parents, crime on our streets, and of course Darfur.  To my knowledge, he never actually answered how to confront even those problems.  Most likely negotiation.  Obama's answer to the question of when human life begins was to say that answering the question was "above his pay grade".
 
John McCain on the other hand provided answers which were devestating to Obama's campaign:  McCain's answer on how to confront evil was to "defeat it", and his answer to the question of when human life begins was "at conception".  If for no other reason than the stark contrast between Obama's answers and McCain's, Barack Hussein Obama should be excluded from the Presidency.  What Obama calls "nuance" most Americans, including myself, call "refusing to answer the question".
 
So, because of Obama's answers to these two questions alone he felt his only option left was to accuse John McCain of cheating.  An outright lie and leap in logic that I have come to recognize all too well from liberals.  No one should be surprised at Obama's accusation of cheating.  A liberal forced to give straight answers is much like a fish being out of water.  Obama's performance at Rick Warren's forum was one of the best examples of that comparison.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Georgia Duo's Big Foot Hoax

Who could have possibly known this would turn out to be a hoax?  Surely there was no clue whatsoever as to the fraudulent nature of this ridiculous spectacle:
The hunt was on Wednesday for two North American forest-roaming bipeds, last seen in Northern California, present whereabouts unknown.

Matthew Whitton and Rick Dyer, the Georgia men who claimed to have found a Bigfoot body, were being sought by Tom Biscardi, whose money they absconded with once the frozen "corpse" was revealed to be a hoax.

"We have a contract with these people," Biscardi, a former Las Vegas promoter now based in Menlo Park, Calif., told Fox News Wednesday morning. "We paid them the money the night before [the press conference.] ... They didn't figure I'd have a turbo heater on that thing to thaw it out before they left California."

Biscardi wouldn't confirm where the body was, but it apparently had been moved from Georgia to Indiana. An Indianapolis Fox affiliate was given a look at the "corpse" Monday by Biscardi's investigator, Steve Kulls.

Asked to confirm rumors that he'd given Dyer and Whitton a $50,000 advance on future earnings from the bogus Bigfoot, Biscardi would say only that "it was a substantial amount of money" numbering in the thousands which came from unnamed "investors."

Biscardi told Fox's Megyn Kelly, who'd previously been invited to view the specimen herself, that the rubber Halloween suit had been stuffed full of, well, organic material.

"It was the most macabre thing you've ever seen in your life," he said. "There's body parts of other animals in there — bones, eyes, tongues, cheeks. It's just incredible."

Asked how he could have been fooled, Biscardi argued that it was hard to tell when the thing was encased in a block of ice.

Meanwhile, other Bigfoot hunters nationwide piled on Biscardi, noting that he was perfectly willing to charge for photos of the "corpse" on his Web site before Kulls determined it was fake early on Sunday morning.

"Warrants need to be issued immediately before Biscardi leaves the country," read a manifesto posted on the Web site of the Bigfoot Field Researchers Organization. "Santa Clara County, California, (where the press conference was held) clearly has jurisdiction to issue the warrants, and all the elements of fraud are present."

But Nick Muyo, a spokesman with the Santa Clara County district attorney's office, said jurisdiction might be hard to establish.

"If Tom Biscardi files a police report in Menlo Park, it would originate with San Mateo County," he said. "But it sounds like Santa Clara, as well as counties in Georgia and Indiana, could also get involved."

It's possible that fraud charges could be filed against Dyer and Whitton, as Biscardi seems to want, though it's not clear whether it'd be a criminal or civil case.

"[Biscardi] freely gave them the money," noted Jeffrey Turner, police chief of Clayton County, Ga., who fired Whitton as an officer Tuesday but couldn't locate him to inform him of his termination. "It'd be a civil matter."

Muyo said that once a police report was filed, then a criminal investigation could be launched.

Kulls, meanwhile, whom the BFRO labeled as "a long-time member of Biscardi's own gang," contacted Loren Coleman at Cryptomundo.com on Tuesday to dissociate himself from Biscardi.

"At this time I am breaking any association or cooperation with Tom Biscardi and his company," Kulls' statement read, though it also said, "People ask me if [Biscardi] was complicit in this hoax. I honestly believe he was not."

It may be difficult for Biscardi to claim he was defrauded, as the "24-Hour Sighting Hotline" number posted on Dyer and Whitton's Web site, BigfootTracker.com, asks for tips related to "leprechauns, unicorns, large cats, dinosaurs," as well as "Jimmy Hoffa or Elvis."

As for one scientist who Biscardi said on Friday would be examining the Bigfoot body? He told a news network he'd never been contacted.

Stanford University anthropologist Richard Klein said he was "sorry that my name and Stanford's name have been brought into this."
The Georgia duo asking for tips related to leprechauns, unicorns, Jimmy Hoffa, and Elvis was probably a dead give-away.  Surprisingly, Geraldo Rivera did not contact the two men with information on what lies inside Al Capone's vault. 
 
It is almost unbelievable how completely retarded and just plain dumb this story is.  I don't even know why I am posting it other than to give another example of just how deep into the gutter the media will dig to entertain the witless masses who view their channels.
 
Unicorns and leprechauns?  Good grief.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama, Light in the Loafers on Constitutional Law

Ann Coulter has a truly excellent name for team Obama's consideration for Vice President of the United States:
This week, Barack Obama's challenge is to select a running mate who's young, hip, and whose accomplishments in life don't overshadow Obama's. Allow me to suggest Kevin Federline.

The only thing we can be sure of is that Obama will choose someone who is the polar opposite of all his advisers until now. In other words, it will be a very, very white male who was probably proud of his country even before being chosen as Obama's running mate.

Obama's got a lot of ground to make up following that performance last weekend at the Saddleback presidential forum with pastor Rick Warren. Continued

After seeing Obama defend infanticide with the glib excuse that the question of when life begins is above his "pay-grade," Rev. Jeremiah Wright announced that although he's known Obama for 30 years, he only recently became aware of how extreme the senator's viewpoints were. Wright, after all, has his reputation to consider.

Network heads responded by dashing off an urgent memo: During the main presidential debates this fall, ask NO questions about abortion, ethics or evil! Morality isn't the Democrats' forte.
Ann continues with some focus on Barack Obama's Constitutional Law credentials.  I too am beginning to wonder if Barack has ever actually read the Constitution given some of his answers last weekend at Rick Warren's forum.  One thing is for sure, consistency is not one of Obama's strongpoints: 
But most stunningly, when Warren asked Obama if he supported a constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman, Obama said he did not "because historically -- because historically, we have not defined marriage in our Constitution."

I don't care if you support a marriage amendment or not. That answer is literally the stupidest thing I've ever heard anyone say. If marriage were already defined in the Constitution, we wouldn't need an amendment, no?

Say, you know what else was "historically" not defined in the Constitution? Slavery. The words "slavery" and "slave" do not appear once in the original Constitution. The framers correctly thought it would sully the freedom-enshrining document to acknowledge the repellent practice. (Much like abortion!)

But in 1865, the 13th Amendment banned slavery throughout the land, in the first constitutional phrase ever to mention "slavery": "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction."

On Obama's "historical" argument, they shouldn't have passed the 13th Amendment because the Constitution "historically" had not mentioned slavery.

Do we know for a fact Barack Obama has read the Constitution? Obama's Facebook profile: "I'm pro-infanticide, I love sunsets, and I don't get the 13th Amendment!"
Read Ann Coulter's entire column by following the link above to Human Events.  Does Barack Obama even listen to the idiocy spewing out of his mouth during these acts of "nuance"?  Ann's right as usual, by Dumbo's logic slavery should be legal.  Issues such as slavery and the destruction of a civil institution which has been proven over thousands of years is exactly why Amendments are supposed to be added to the Constitution.
 
Though slavery is by far a worse infraction against humanity, both slavery and destroying marriage also errode civilized societies.  We put Amendments in place to protect our country from such things.  Disallowing religious freedom, which is what allowing gay marriage will do, goes against one of the most basic principles that founded our nation.  Reason being; who's going to marry the homosexuals if gay marriage is defined as a basic human right?  Judeo-Christian churches will be sued across the country for refusing to perform marriage ceremonies for homosexuals, thereby stripping the majority of the people in America from worshipping as they see fit.  If you think for one second that all the gays are simply going to form their own church for the purpose of performing marriage ceremonies then you are disconnected from reality.
 
The whole point is to force churches to perform marriage ceremonies for homosexuals.  It's an outright attack on Christianity.  That is why conservatives and generally Christian Americans support a Marriage Amendment.  But for Barack Obama this is not something you should be worried about.  After all, there so many more issues which far outweigh religious freedom... like forcing you to stop driving your infernal gas-guzzling cars and trucks!
 
What Ann's column this week exposes is Barack Obama's inability to think clearly... or even logically.  For liberals, the serious challenges facing our country are little more than academic debates.  This sort of irresponsible worldview is extremely dangerous when played-out in our Legislature.  Yet another reason I knew we were in big trouble when both nominees turned out to be candidates who come straight from the Senate.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Aborts Question of When Life Begins

During the forum held at Rick Warren's church where John McCain and Barack Obama separately answered a series of questions by the popular pastor, Obama aborted the question on abortion stating that he is unqualified to make a decision on when human life begins:
Answering Warren’s question of when a baby is entitled to human rights, Obama said, “Well, I think that whether you are looking at it from a theological perspective or a scientific perspective, answering that question with specificity, you know, is above my pay grade.”

Obama said he was pro-choice. When pressed to say whether he’d ever voted to limit abortions, Obama slipped and slid around the question, claiming he was in favor of limits on late-term abortions, but cited no example of ever voting for legislation to create such limits. McCain said plainly that he believed that life beings at conception and that, “I will be a pro-life president and this presidency will have pro life policies. That's my commitment, that's my commitment to you.”
An even more disturbing answer from Barack Obama than I expected.  What other serious questions are above his pay grade?  Murder?  Robbery?  Adultery?  Lying?  Is there nothing that is not inherently lowered to a position of moral relativism with this man?  For crying out loud, you don't even have to have the right answer to the question of when life begins to be able to make a decision for yourself!
 
It's obvious Obama was either being dishonest with his answer or is unfit to bus Clarence Thomas' dinner table, much less decide whether or not Thomas is fit to be on the Supreme Court.  He aboslutely has a position on the issue, regardless of his incriminating voting record.  Generally, along the way in some fashion, Barack Obama has a basic answer for himself on the question of when life begins.  It could be at conception, immediately after the child is out of the womb, an hour after the child is out of the womb, six months into the pregnancy; somewhere along the way he believes a child is a human being and is endowed with the right to live.  To say that such a fundamental question is "above my pay grade" is at the least moronic and at worst an outright lie.  His nothing answer is almost retarded or brain damaged in nature if he was telling the truth.
 
Pro-abortion supporters across the country can give you some sort of answer to the question of when life begins.  A great many of them will tell you the child turns into a human life after it is out of the womb.  Even partial-birth abortion supporters will tell you that a child is a human life at some point fairly soon after it is completely and totally born and the umbilical chord has been cut.  This is not a terribly difficult concept, and is nowhere near above Obama's pay grade... whatever that may be. 
 
It can for some be a difficult decision (though I will never quite understand why) on whether or not to be pro-abortion or pro-life, but to state that you have no position on when life begins is to say you have no position on abortion at all.  We all know provably and indisputably that Barack Obama does indeed have a stated position on abortion.  He himself admits he is an abortionist, and proudly so.  If you support abortion then you believe, somewhere along the way before the child has left the womb, that it is not a human with a right to life.  So Obama should have at least answered, being an abortionist who says he is against late-term abortions, that he knows human life begins at some point in the later days of a pregnancy. 

I don't even believe there is a right to commit abortion and I can come up with that much! 

This all becomes especially incomprehensible when you understand, just for the sake of the question posed, that it doesn't matter which side he supports on the abortion issue. Whether Obama is for them or against them he still must have a position on when human life begins or he cannot in any way have positions on abortion and late-term abortion.
 
There is one other possibility.  Barack Obama may in fact not care at all about abortion or when human life begins.  If that is the case, then a lot of this lunacy starts to make some sense.  If you know an issue is important to a lot of voters, but you yourself couldn't care less, then you must either lie repeatedly or give answers which reflect no real position at various times throughout your campaign.
 
Are we dealing with a completely empty mind in Barack Obama?  Does he have any beliefs that are his own and not simply a list of non-talking points?  This man has spent so much of his life never taking a position on anything, ever, that he is now unable to answer even the most basic of questions.  Not only that, he is unable to answer a question about his position on an issue when he actually has a repeatedly stated position. 
 
His answer to the question of when human life begins is why Obama was unable to answer Rick Warren's question on how to deal with evil.  The New Messiah could not answer that one either.  His only answer to the question of how to deal with evil was to warn against accidently doing evil in the name of good while trying to fight evil.
 
Barack Obama's performance in this forum was an utter failure not only as a politician, but as a man and an American.  Every answer he gave was a description of a person who is totally indecisive and uncomfortable with himself and his own beliefs... if he has any beliefs that is.  I'm not sure he does.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russian Ceasefire Rules: Replace One Invasion Force With Another

Again the The Times Online brings us some of the best reporting from Georgia, and gives a shining example to the media in my own country what real journalism is supposed to look like.  Tony Halpin in Gori and David Byers detail the continued invasion and occupation of Georgia by the Russian army:
The Russian occupation of the Georgian city of Gori appeared to be more entrenched tonight, despite claims by President Medvedev that his troops were planning to withdraw. 

As international pressure increased on Mr Medvedev to implement a French-brokered ceasefire pledge signed last week, the Kremlin declared today that Russian forces would start pulling back from the occupied territory tomorrow.

The ceasefire deal was meant to conclude a five-day war in which Russian forces launched an all-out assault within Georgia after stopping a Georgian army assault against Moscow-backed separatists the autonomous region of South Ossetia.

Yet despite Mr Medvedev's claim that a withdrawal was imminent, evidence from the scene today in Gori seemed to indicate that forces would not be leaving soon.

The Times was told that, after destroying Georgian radio and television transmitters, Russian troops had now installed their own, meaning Gori residents can now only tune in to channels from Moscow.

In addition, Russian troops were seen bolstering their positions in the hills which surround Gori, including creating improved machine gun posts.

Troops continue to surround Gori with tanks, armoured personnel carriers and security forces. All Georgian police and law enforcement were said to still be banned by Russia from operating there.

Russia's continuing presence in the city is now causing huge anger and frustration within Georgia's military ranks, as Georgian troops have withdrawn from Gori to Tblisi, and - according to the terms of last week's ceasefire - are under strict instructions not to confront the Russian forces unless they attack the capital.

Russia is believed to be continuing to refuse Gori's provincial administration any control over the city's policing and security, and it only has authority at present to oversee the distribution of aid, which was itself proving difficult to hand out amid the continuing Russian occupation.

Russian forces also continuing to man positions along the main road from Tbilisi to Gori, including at a checkpoint in Igoeti, only 30km from the capital.

However, despite Georgian claims that Russian forces were involved in a wrecking spree in Gori, there was little evidence to suggest this was taking place. Windows have been blown out in many of the homes and businesses in the centre of town following shelling over the past few days, but there is little evidence there has been a deliberate destruction of infrastructure.
It's just great how the Russians have more respect for buildings than they do for the lives of civilians.  Once again we see the ultimate logical conclusion of socialism and modern liberalism.  The real kicker is reported below.  Russian "peacekeepers" are to replace the invading Russian army.  According to the Russian puppet-President, the replacement of one invasion force with another should be taking place any time now. 
 
Of course, this is the same Commie who gave his word the Russians would immediately halt their invasion days ago, stop their attacks, and at the very least move back into South Ossetia and Abkhazia.  They stayed put in Gori instead, where they remain today without any signs of leaving.  Nevermind the fact that the Russians should not even be in South Ossetia and Abkhazia to begin with. There was never once a request from Georgia for them to help "keep the peace" in either of those provinces.
Despite what appeared evidence of forces refusing to ease their occupation, Russian General Vyacheslav Borisov insisted that a promised withdrawal would take place. “The Russian troops are starting to pull out and Russian peacekeepers are coming in,” he said.

President Medvedev also insisted today that Russian regular forces would start their pull-out tomorrow.

“From tomorrow, Russia will begin withdrawing its military forces that are supporting Russian peacekeepers,” Mr Medvedev told Nicolas Sarkozy, the French President who negotiated the ceasefire, in a telephone conversation.

The pair discussed the“practical realisation” of the six-point ceasefire plan, the Kremlin added.

Promising a withdrawal of Russian forces, Mr Medvedev also “underlined the need for the unconditional and strict fulfilment by the Georgian side of the return of its military units to their permanent positions,” the statement said.

France, however, said that Mr Sarkozy used the phonecall to warn his Russian counterpart of the “serious consequences that a failure to quickly and fully implement the deal would have on relations between Russia and the European Union."

Of the phonecall, Condoleezza Rice, the US Secretary of State, ratcheted up the rhetoric accusing Mr Medvedev of failing to adhere to the ceasefire and demanding he now does so. “This is the promise that the Russian president has given to the French president .. I hope this time he’ll keep his word," she said.

She also castigated Moscow for the eruption of violence in the Caucasus saying that it was now paying the price for its display of “disproportionate force against a small neighbour."

As international pressure on Russia to make good its promises increased, Angela Merkel, the German Chancellor, went to Georgia to repeat European and American demands for a swift withdrawal.

In a statement of solidarity with Georgia, she said that eastern European country would join the Western defence alliance Nato despite Russia’s fierce opposition to such a move. “Georgia will become a member of Nato if it wants to - and it does want to,” she said.

Meanwhile, Gori's civil administration appeared to be struggling to distribute aid amid the Russian siege.

As an aid bus arrived in the centre of the city, a crowd of 150 jostled against the bus to try to be first in line. An official travelling with the aid convoy was heard to shout: “Be quiet! Order! Everyone will get their turn," to try to calm the commotion.

The bus, which had arrived packed with boxes containing rice and dried beans from the Turkish Red Crescent, was swamped by the crowd who held up identity cards as proof that they had registered for help.
I must admit, I am somewhat relieved to read Angela Merkel's words of solidarity with Georgia along with her acceptance of Georgia into NATO.  As long as the Russian-NATO Council still exists, much of NATO's power is terribly deminished.  Regardless Merkel's trip to Tiblisi and her statement concerning Georgia's membership in NATO is reassuring.  Yes, I try to see at least some light wherever it may shine.
 
Condi Rice on the other hand, continued to offer words of hope and change.  Empty rhetoric designed to placate those of us who are extremely concerned with Russia's actions over the past two weeks.  I would say at least it's good she's there, but in my experience Rice's presence usually leads to more trouble than she's worth.  If we were worth even spit as an ally, Condi Rice and Robert Gates would be personally taking a contingent of American soldiers into Gori right now to order the Russian army out of Georgia and back into South Ossetia and Abkhazia at the minimum.  The notion that such an action would not work with approximately a 90% chance of not even a shot being fired is cowardly and unrealistic given the circumstances.
 
One of the most disturbing things for me has been when I've either heard U.S. Marines over the airwaves or spoken to them personally and listened to what they believe we should be doing in Georgia.  U.S. troops have been fighting and dying alongside Georgians in Iraq and Afghanistan, and I can tell you from direct conversations and live statements on the air that our men and women in uniform make me look like a silly moderate.  Our soldiers are frustrated with the Russian invasion probably more than any group of people in America.  The United States Military knows how to stand by a friend and defend our allies in the world.  Our politicians on the other hand are pathetic, woefully lacking in leadership, and typically incompetent. 
 
On this subject, John Bolton and John McCain have thankfully stood out from the pack of idiots running the country.  I'm no fan at all of John McCain's domestic policies or his contempt of conservatives; however, on foreign policy he has outshined not only his opponent but every other politician in regards to Russia's invasion of Georgia.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Condi Rice Fails Again, Russian Army Still Roams Georgian Countryside

As predicted, our Secretary of State produced yet another abysmal failure as reports out of Georgia prove the Russian army is still invading our ally and occupying territory well outside of South Ossetia and Abkhazia.  The moment I learned Condi Rice was headed to Tiblisi, I knew Georgia was lost.  Like Israel, if Condi Rice has anything to do with it, security and territorial integrity are out the window in favor of our enemies. 

With the exact same mindset that provided Israel with increased attacks from Palestinian terrorists surrounding their nation, Rice forced the President of Georgia to accept one of the worst ceasefire agreements in modern history and offered no support from the United States other than a few pretty words.  Although, there are some reports of Secretary Rice delivering blankets, gruel, and some bandaids.
Twenty-four hours after Condoleezza Rice, the US secretary of state, flew into Georgia and demanded the immediate departure of Russian troops, they were on the move yesterday.

However, instead of retreating north into South Ossetia, where Moscow-backed separatists have been fighting to break away from Georgia, the Russians headed south towards the capital, Tbilisi. They came to a halt only 20 miles outside the city.

A convoy of two Russian tanks, several armoured personnel carriers mounted with heavy machineguns and Russian flags and a few trucks filled with troops took up positions along the main road from Tbilisi to Gori, Stalin’s home town near the South Ossetian border.

The incursion was the deepest into Georgia proper since hostilities began 10 days ago. The troops dug foxholes along a hill only 30 minutes’ drive from the capital, watched by heavily armed Georgian soldiers and police. Men from the rival camps who had been shelling one another a few days earlier suddenly found themselves too close for comfort.

At first, the soot-covered Russian soldiers sat idly on their vehicles, cradling AK47s under the heat of a searing sun. Then a Georgian soldier in US-issued camouflage walked up to them carrying his national flag. Within minutes the two sides were chatting and exchanging cigarettes and water.

“It’s beautiful here,” said one Russian officer as he stepped out of a jeep with tinted windows. “This is a place where one should come on holiday, not war.”

The bonhomie was misleading, however. Some of the Georgian soldiers were visibly stunned to see a foreign army so deep inside their country.

They seemed alarmed that Russian military operations still had not ended four days after President Dmitry Medvedev announced that he had halted them.

The previous day Rice had all but forced Mikhail Saakashvili, the Georgian president, to sign a ceasefire that sealed his defeat. Yesterday Medvedev added his signature.

The document, drafted under the supervision of President Nicolas Sarkozy of France and amended by the Kremlin, allows the Russian military to remain in South Ossetia and Abkhazia, the two breakaway regions that Saakashvili had vowed to return to Tbilisi’s control.

Even more damaging for the Georgian leader’s political prospects, it gives the Russians the right to remain several miles inside Georgian territory to await an international peace-keeping force - which could take weeks to assemble.

Since the defeated and demoralised Georgian army pulled out of South Ossetia last week, the Russians have secured or destroyed its military installations and arms dumps.

By yesterday afternoon they had moved back towards South Ossetia but were still positioned on the outskirts of Gori and in the Black Sea port of Poti, where they have blown up several Georgian coastguard vessels.

South Ossetian paramilitaries were also still active in the west of the country where they were reported to be looting Georgian villages. They have been accused of ethnic cleansing, of torching villages and, in several cases, of abducting young women.

The Kremlin gave its strongest signal yet that both South Ossetia and Abkhazia would be integrated into Russia. Saakashvili’s future as president seemed far less certain.

He was vilified by the Kremlin as a US stooge before hostilities broke out. The Russians are now bent on seeing him removed from power. Moscow has dispatched investigators from the prosecutor’s office to South Ossetia to gather testimony that it hopes to use in a criminal case against the president.

In Tbilisi many last week thought Saakashvili’s fate was already sealed. While he is credited with turning round Georgia’s economy and modernising the small state, he is expected to face a furious backlash over the failed military action.
The cold hard fact of the matter is that Russia will not stop unless they are either seriously threatened within an inch of their little piggy lives or otherwise physically forced to halt their invasion and refrain from threatening neighboring countries with nuclear strikes.  Because our government does nothing to support our strongest allies, some of who fight and die alongside our own soldiers in the Middle-East, not only does Russia continue its invasion of Georgia but we now have to deal with Russia's refusal to adhere to Ukraine's sovereignty over their own port city.  This does not even begin to address Russia threatening Poland and Ukraine with a nuclear attack for attempting to bring themselves under our defense net in order to protect their people from the very same nuclear missiles Russia is terrorizing them with!
 
For some reason I just don't take the whole try to defend yourselves and we'll nuke you concept very well.  It's probably the Texan in me.  My personal response to a threat like that is to give the Ukraine and Poland a few of our own nukes to play with.  There is only one way to deal with a bully.  Raise the stakes and call every bluff.  The Russians are thugs through and through.  Aggressively defend yourself and they will retreat every time.  As I've said before, regardless of Moscow's delusions the Soviet Union is dead and will remain so unless we sit by and allow Russia to march across Europe.  Stop them now while the effort to do is not nearly as great as it will be if we wait.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russia to Ukraine: Defend Against Our Missiles and We Will Nuke You!

Instead of the Russian Black Sea Fleet doing as they are told by their hosts in the Ukraine, Moscow is arming their Black Sea Fleet with nuclear missiles.  That way the nukes don't have to travel very far when Russia has to carry-out its threat to nuke the Ukraine for defending itself against those very same missiles.
Ukraine yesterday offered to create a joint missile defence network with the West amid fears that its port city of Sebastopol, home of the Russian Black Sea fleet, could become the next flashpoint between Russia and its former satellites. 

The Ukrainian offer, which means its early warning radar stations could become part of the West’s civil defence system, will further damage poor relations between Kiev and Moscow.

Ukraine, which to the fury of Russia is looking towards Europe and membership of Nato, announced last week that it would require the Russian fleet to seek permission whenever ships entered its territorial waters.

Viktor Yushchenko, Ukraine’s reformist president who visited the Georgian capital Tbilisi last week to support President Mikhail Saakashvili, said the use of Russian ships for a war violated Ukraine’s neutrality and risked drawing it into conflict.

He instructed his security council to draw up new rules forcing Russia to apply up to 10 days in advance for permission for its fleet to move in and out of Ukraine’s territorial waters.

This weekend Yushchenko said a threat to Georgia’s territorial integrity should be viewed as a potential threat to Ukraine’s: “We have lived through the most terrible 10 days of our recent history.”

The Russian response was immediate. Colonel-General Anatoly Nogovitsyn, deputy chief of the Russian general staff, who last week warned Poland that it could face a nuclear strike after signing a deal with the United States to place a missile shield on its soil, made a belligerent statement to Ukraine.

He said Russian ships would ignore the order to seek permission, which he claimed was “illegitimate”.

Vladimir Putin, the Russian prime minister, warned Yushchenko last February that Russia could point nuclear missiles at Ukraine if it cooperated with US missile defence plans.

Ukraine is insisting the Russian military must leave Sebastopol when the lease on the base expires in 2017. The Russian navy has made it clear it may refuse to do so.
Russia now claims that Ukraine's sovereignty over their own city is "illegitimate".  Illegitimate?  The Russians apparently don't understand exactly what independence and sovereignty means unless it's their own.  What, you may ask, is it about the fact that Sebastopol is not a Russian city that Moscow does not understand?  Everything. 
 
You see, from Moscow's standpoint all these independent countries who are now nieghbors are actually rebel states which rightfully belong to Russia.  The Communist pigs in the Kremlin don't even come close to viewing Sebastopol as belonging to the sovereign nation of the Ukraine.  Therefore, they have no intention of leaving or following any rules set down by the Ukraine government... in solidarity with Georgia or otherwise.
 
What some call "Russia reasserting itself", I call "Russia invading and conquering its neighbors to reform the Soviet Union".  The former being near fantasy and the latter being fact.  The ultimate question in all of Russia's pillaging, looting, burning, and generally destroying our allies in Europe is:  Exactly how long are we going to sit by and watch it happen all over again?  Are we really going to look away when Russia invades Poland of all places?  Is there anyone at all in our government who has even skimmed through a credible history book of the 20th Century?  Does the term "Nazi Blitzkreig" mean anything to you?  How about "Gulag"?
 
The Russian army begins its march across Europe reminding everyone just how well Nazi Germany's strategy can work, and half the world is mesmerized by China's fight against "the mist" during the completely fabricated and irrelevant Olympics!  One Communist stronghold distracts us with pretty lights and shiny things while the other Communist stronghold is literally setting our allies in Europe on fire.  If this is not a testement to just how stupid people really are then the word "stupid" has no meaning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (9) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russia Threatens to Nuke the Ukraine!

Not content with invading, interning and slaughtering civilians, and generally setting fire to the countryside throughout Georgia while directly threatening to nuke Poland, Moscow has now added the Ukraine to its list of countries to assault with nuclear missiles:
Russia is considering arming its Baltic fleet with nuclear warheads for the first time since the cold war, senior military sources warned last night. 

The move, in response to American plans for a missile defence shield in Europe, would heighten tensions raised by the advance of Russian forces to within 20 miles of Tbilisi, the Georgian capital, yesterday.

Under the Russian plans, nuclear warheads could be supplied to submarines, cruisers and fighter bombers of the Baltic fleet based in Kaliningrad, a Russian enclave between the European Union countries of Poland and Lithuania. A senior military source in Moscow said the fleet had suffered from underfunding since the collapse of communism. “That will change now,” said the source. 

“In view of America’s determination to set up a missile defence shield in Europe, the military is reviewing all its plans to give Washington an adequate response.”

The proposal to bring back nuclear warheads was condemned by Kurt Volker, the US ambassador to Nato, who said he knew of the threat.

“It is really unfortunate that Russia chooses to react by putting nuclear warheads in different places – if indeed it does that – when the rest of the world is not looking at some kind of old-fashioned superpower conflict,” he said.

The warnings came 24 hours after Russia told Poland that it could face a nuclear strike for agreeing to let the United States station components of the missile defence shield on its soil.

The Russian military also said it would ignore attempts to restrict the movement of its Black Sea fleet in and out of Sebastopol, in Ukraine. The Crimean port was emerging as a potential flashpoint in Russia’s efforts to prevent former Soviet countries on its borders from joining Nato.

This weekend Ukraine further angered Russian officials by offering to create a joint missile defence network with western countries.

The Russians have already indicated that they may point nuclear missiles at western Europe from bases in Kaliningrad and Belarus. They are also said to be thinking of reviving a military presence in Cuba.

In Georgia, Russian forces extended their reach across the west of the country yesterday, occupying several towns, seizing control of a main road and blowing up a railway bridge. Working with Abkhazian fighters they seized several Georgian villages and the Enguri power station. They pulled out of Igoeti, a village near the capital, after President Dmitry Medvedev signed a ceasefire agreement. The deal gave the Russians the right to continue patrolling “a few miles” inside Georgia. President George W Bush called the signing a “hopeful step”.

David Cameron, the Conservative leader, seized the initiative with a lightning trip to Tbilisi, becoming the first British politician to meet President Mikhail Saakashvili since the conflict began. Critics have accused government ministers of dithering.

Writing in today’s Sunday Times, Cameron says: “Russian armies can’t march into other countries while Russian shoppers carry on marching into Selfridges.”
The Commies are going back to Cuba as well.  Oh goody!  So we can add that to the list too.  The list of countries to invade and threats to the United States from the Kremlin is getting longer by the day.  The Russians don't waste any time do they?
 
As for the Ukraine, you need to understand clearly that Sebastapol and its port is sovereign territory of the Ukraine; not Russian property.  Moscow has no legitimate claims to the city whatsoever.  The Ukraine has now put extreme limitation on the Russian's Black Sea Fleet which is dependent on the port at Sebastapol along with deciding to not renew the Russian contract for its use when it comes up in 2017.  No one with an IQ larger than that of a toaster oven, and who is also not a Communist, can claim any Russian legitimacy to the use of the port at Sebastapol.  Russia is a guest there.  The Ukraine is not a part of Russia in any way.
 
All that being said and understood clearly; Russia has stated they will now ignore the decisions from the Ukranian government that Russia give 10 days notice before moving ships in or out of the Sebastapol port and that Russia will also ignore the order for their Black Sea Fleet to be moved out of Sebastapol in 2017 when their contract is up.  As far as Moscow is concerned, the Ukraine belongs to Russia.
 
Here's the dialogue:
 
Ukraine:  Russia, you may no longer use our port to support the Black Sea Fleet.
 
Russia:  Silly Ukraine, we are going to use it anyway or we will fire nuclear missiles at your cities.
 
Is it just me, or is there a dark pattern forming?  Invade Georgia, threaten to nuke Poland, refuse to leave the Ukraine and threaten them with a nuclear strike as well.  Oh yes, let's not forget all the support in weapons, logistics, and various supplies the Russians are giving to Iran.  People seem to forget about that one as the Russian army roams the Georgian countryside murdering civilians and burning everything in sight.  Russian helicopters are even dropping fire bombs in the forests and setting them ablaze too!
 
Warnings about Russia from men like John Bolton and John McCain have all of a sudden began to ring true.  We never listen when we should.  Madness and chaos spreads across Europe from a threat many thought was gone for good.  Meanwhile, most of the world is transfixed by China replacing a buck-toothed fat girl who can sing with a pretty-perfect one who has to lip-sync at the Beijing Olympics!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive