About Me

Name:Cary Wesberry
Email: carywesberry@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

U.S. Diplomat Sent to Engage in Direct Talks With Iran

The Bush Administration now does exactly what they said we would not do; engage in direct talks with Iran.  So much for unwavering commitment to strong foreign policy.  There should be no doubt that Iran is as near to joy as Islamic fascists can get without beheading someone over this prospect.  That speech Ahmadinejad gave at Columbia University has paid off!  Excerpts from the breaking news earlier today: 
WASHINGTON — For now, the Bush administration has chosen compromise over confrontation in dealing with Iran's disputed nuclear program with a dramatic gesture intended to demonstrate commitment to a negotiated solution.

In breaking with past policy to send a top diplomat to weekend talks with Iran's chief nuclear envoy, the administration has in its waning months refined its position on contact with the hardline Iranian regime, much as it did in the ongoing effort to rid North Korea of its atomic weapons, which has shown recent promise.

U.S. officials on Wednesday dismissed comparisons between the administration's approach to the two remaining members of Bush's "axis of evil," but they acknowledged broad similarities in the end game.

They said the participation of William Burns, the State Department's third-ranking diplomat, in Saturday's meeting in Switzerland is aimed at proving America's resolve to peacefully prevent Iran from developing nuclear arms while also exploiting perceived splits in Iran's hardline Islamic government.

"What this does show is how serious we are when we say that we want to try to solve this diplomatically," White House press secretary Dana Perino told reporters a day after President Bush signed off on dispatching Burns to the meeting with Iranian nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili.
Current White House Spokesmother Dana Perino reassures Barack Obama just how serious we are about solving the issue of Iran's nuclear weapons program his way instead of John McCain's.  Out of being completely flabbergasted at this new development, the McCain campaign had no immediate comment upon learning the news.  John McCain has repeatedly stated, and rightly so, that direct talks with Iran only legitimizes their terrorist leaders along with making them stronger and much more difficult to deal with.  If I were John McCain right now, I might be fairly outraged after learning that we are going to talk directly with the Iranian regime.
 
However, this could all be a way for the White House to distance itself from what is assuredly a pending attack from Israel on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities.  An attack which President Bush supports on principle if not in action.  Former Ambassador to the UN, John Bolton, had a great deal to say about this recently as well.  Bolton made it quite clear that if we are not going to physically aid Israel in an attack on Iran that we should do our best to make it as easy an operation as possible.  It's definitely worth taking another look at Bolton's column, especially given the news today of our direct talks with Iran's foreign diplomat.
 
We should all take note that "talks" and "negotiations" are two different things as Dana Perino explained to the press:
Burns will not negotiate with Jalili but officials said he will listen to his presentation of Iran's final answer to the package. Burns will also restate a U.S. offer for formal negotiations with Iran if it suspends uranium enrichment and reprocessing. He will warn that if the deal is not accepted, the Iranian government can expect more sanctions to be imposed on its banking and financial sectors. And, he will remind Iran that Bush has not taken the military option off the table.
Couldn't we have made this clear to Iran without actually sitting across the table from them in direct talks?  I think so.  One other possibility that could be a small light in the dark; the press might be inflating this news and making it all into something it's not.  While I still don't appreciate what is being described as "direct talks" with the Iranian fascists, we will have to wait and see what happens next.  With the very real possibility of an Israeli attack, any sort of talks about Iran's nuclear weapons program may shortly become meaningless.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

U.S. Troops Massing to Attack Taliban Along Afghan-Pakistan Border

It appears we are finally going to commit large amounts of soldiers to end the constant incursions of Taliban and al-Qaeda from Pakistan's lawless regions into Afghanistan.  I could not be more pleased with this news.  The Taliban has for much too long freely crossed the Afghan-Pakistan border to cause death and destruction in Afghanistan, severely setting-back reconstruction efforts along with killing our soldiers and many innocent Afghanis in the process.  The news broke early today:
US troops in Afghanistan massed close to the border yesterday for a possible attack on al-Qaeda and Taleban bases in the lawless North Waziristan tribal belt in Pakistan.

Reports from the area said that hundreds of Nato troops were airlifted across the mountains from the village of Lowara Mandi, which has been an important base for cross-border attacks in Afghanistan. Heavy artillery and armoured vehicles were also being moved into position.

The deployment followed a claim by the Afghan Government on Monday that the Pakistani Army and its spy agency had become “the world's biggest producers of terrorism and extremism”. The Pakistani Foreign Ministry accused Kabul of creating an “artificial crisis to satisfy short-term political expediencies”.
President Bush vowed to investigate the accusations from the Afghan government.  The President was also quoted saying, "I certainly hope that the [Pakistani] Government understands the dangers of extremists moving in their country."  I'm fairly certain the Pakistani government will not do much of anything to destroy the Taliban and al-Qaeda.  We have been shown time and again that Pakistan has little power in the Waziristan region, and they order their military into retreat frequently when confronted by the Taliban.  The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs made a trip to Islamabad this weekend ahead of U.S. operations:
US Admiral Michael Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, made an announced visit to Islamabad at the weekend and held a series of meetings with Pakistan's top civil and military leadership.

According to well-placed sources, Admiral Mullen warned Pakistan that the US could take unilateral military action if the cross-border attacks in Afghanistan were not stopped. The US official said that some elements within Pakistani security agencies could be helping the insurgents operate from their bases in the border region.
Evidently we are taking the accusations from the Afghan government concerning the Pakistanis aiding Taliban and al-Qaeda forces along the border region.  Another report from earlier today discussed Afghan President Karzai's disgust with Pakistan, and some direct warnings as well:
KABUL, AFGHANISTAN -- The president of Afghanistan threatened Sunday to send troops into Pakistan if Taliban fighters holed up there continue to cross the border and attack his country.

"Afghanistan has the right of self-defense," President Hamid Karzai told journalists at his presidential palace here. He specifically threatened to target Baitullah Mahsud, the self-declared commander of Pakistan's Taliban movement, who has boasted of sending fighters into Afghanistan.

The comments were the Afghan leader's sharpest warning yet to Pakistan's new leadership, which has been conducting negotiations with Islamic militants, including Mahsud, based in the tribal areas adjoining the border.

In response to the warning, Pakistan said it would consider any such strike by foreign forces inside its territory a violation of its sovereignty. "We hope that it is not the reinitiation of the blame game by Afghanistan," Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammed Sadiq said in a statement.
Pakistan can "consider" whatever it wants as far as I'm concerned.  Credible accusations of their aid to the Taliban are now being leveled, and at the least they are doing nothing to stop the attacks ocurring constantly from Waziristan.  Afghanistan is not playing "the blame game".  What both the U.S. and Afghanistan demand is that Pakistan actually enforce its own sovereignty starting with the Taliban and al-Qaeda.  If the Pakistanis were doing their jobs we would not have to mass soldiers along the border to do it for them. 
 
Karzai has been correct from the beginning.  Pakistan is playing political games while U.S. and Afghan soldiers are fighting and dying to defeat the enemy.  The Pakistan government is in desperate need of being shown what happens to its so-called sovereignty when it provides safe haven to the Taliban and al-Qaeda against their promises of cooperation.
 
We need to move more soldiers into Afghanistan and attack Waziristan with overwhelming force, ending any serious involvement in Afghanistan affairs from the Taliban and al-Qaeda once and for all.  I have prayed for U.S. soldiers to be ordered to secure the Afghan-Pakistan border and now those prayers have been answered.  Now our leadership needs to follow through and do what Pakistan has shown no ability to do for the past six years.  A safe and secure Afghanistan is imperative to our victory against the Taliban and is even more so for the fledgling Afghanistan government.  The sooner we defeat the Taliban and al-Qaeda in that region, the sooner we can finish training the Afghan military, and the sooner we can turn operations over to the Afghan government and have the majority of our soldiers either come home or be transferred to other areas of the world where they are needed.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Olmert's Plan Becomes Reality - Dead Soldiers for Live Terrorists

Soon to be completed is the live-terrorist-for-dead-soldiers prisoner swap between Israel and Hezbollah.  Among those being handed over to Hezbollah is child murderer Samir Kuntar, one of the most viscious terrorists in the world.  Israel of course will recieve the bodies of two deal soldiers killed by Hezbollah after being taken prisoner some time ago. 
 
The moral depravity of Israel's leadership has reached a whole new depth of unbelievability.  Ehud Olmert and his merry little band of thugs that rule Israel with a liberal fist must be thrown out of office before they do so much damage the Jews will be unable to repair it.  What Olmert has done is prove to Hezbollah, and all Islamic fascists, that taking Israelis prisoner then murdering them reaps a huge pay-off.  Now that Israel has agreed to trade terrorist monsters who are very much alive for dead bodies there will be no end to what the Palestinians believe they can squeeze out of the Jews as a reward for their atrocities.  I honestly did not believe the Israeli government was so stupid as to go this far in their cowering appeasement of the enemy.  I was horribly wrong.
 
Aside from the trade itself, there are other sickening facts surrounding this slow suicide.  P. David Hornik writing for Front Page Magazine reports on the statements and actions of Arabs and other officials concerning the prisoner exchange:
As part of a 1979 terror attack in the Israeli coastal town of Nahariya, Kuntar shot dead 28-year-old Danny Haran in front of his 4-year-old daughter Einat Haran, then drowned Danny Haran in the sea to confirm the kill. Kuntar then smashed Einat Haran’s head on rocks and crushed her skull with his rifle butt.

Yet Israeli analyst Jonathan Spyer notes that “the news of the planned swap has been greeted with enthusiasm from politicians on both sides of the [Lebanese] divide.”

Against the Hezbollah-led, mostly Shiite bloc stands the March 14 Sunni-Druze-Christian bloc. Yet new Christian president Michel Suleiman (whose affiliation vis-à-vis the two blocs is a matter of dispute) has told Hezbollah he wants to take part in Kuntar’s welcome-home ceremony. Druze leader and sharp Hezbollah-foe Walid Jumblatt is planning to visit Kuntar (also Druze) and congratulate him on his return, which he called a “national occasion.”

Sunni prime minister Fuad Saniora said Hezbollah’s “success … in the negotiations [with Israel] is a national success for the party and for the struggle of the Lebanese because it secured national goals.…” Spyer reports that “other March 14 leaders spoke in similarly glowing terms.” The Lebanese daily As-Safir reported plans to make the day of the terrorists’ return a national holiday.

Israeli Middle East scholar Barry Rubin notes that “no one in the Arabic-speaking world will say a single negative word about Kuntar’s deed or his being made a hero, despite a small liberal minority’s disgust.”
Samir Kuntar is, and will be, hailed as a hero to the Islamic fascists and Arabs; a national holiday made out of the spectacle in Lebanon.  Though I know differently because of our victory in Iraq and the continued fight in Afghanistan, it is difficult at times to see our progress in this war where the wider Islamist world in the Middle-East is concerned.  However, Bill Roggio doesn't call it The Long War for nothing.
 
Israel is showing the West what negotiatioin and appeasement will get us.  Betrayal, destruction, and death.  Making deals with Islamists will get more innocent people killed.  Now that Samir Kuntar is free, whose four-year old little girl is next in line to get her head smashed in with rocks and the butt of a Jihadist's rifle?  In Israel, a terrorist murders children knowing he will be welcomed back into freedom as a hero to the death cult he came from.  Back home in America we have an election fast approaching.  Is this Barack Obama's true vision of our future as President?  You can bet our own liberals are learning much from those in Israel who see the freedom of Samir Kuntar as a peaceful solution and a path towards healing.  If or when progressives like Barack Obama rule America, will they adopt the current appeasement policies of Israel as the best tactic in dealing with our declared enemies?
 
It should be apparent to anyone watching world events that Islamic fascists flaunt any atrocity, no matter how horrible, as acceptable and as a victory against infidels and Zionists. Whatever terrifying act a Jihadist wants to commit is not only tolerated but encouraged by the Islamists. These people have malformed souls, and our enemies won't stop unless we kill them.  Israel's Palestinian policy proves a disturbing fact.  If Americans will not protect Judeo-Christian morals, values, and ethics then no one else will.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A Black Hole in Dallas

Commissioner Kenneth Mayfield is undergoing a politically correct lynching in Dallas for his comment that the office handling traffic tickets is a "black hole" for paperwork; meaning that traffic tickets go in and are never seen again.  I expect Mr. Mayfield to be tarred, feathered, and run out of town any day now.  Jonah Goldberg describes Mayfield's racial intolerance and abominable comment best:
At a recent meeting of city officials in Dallas County, Texas, a small racial brouhaha broke out. County commissioners were hashing out difficulties with the way the central collections office handles traffic tickets. Commissioner Kenneth Mayfield found himself guilty of talking while white. He observed that the bureaucracy “has become a black hole” for lost paperwork.

Fellow Commissioner John Wiley Price took great offense, shouting, “Excuse me!” That office, the black commissioner explained, has become a “white hole.”
Seizing on the outrage, Judge Thomas Jones demanded that Mayfield apologize for the “racially insensitive analogy,” in the words of the Dallas Morning News’s City Hall Blog.

Houston Chronicle science blogger Eric Berger notes that everyone should be “very glad that the central collections office has not become a white hole, a theoretical object that ejects matter from beyond its event horizon, rather than sucking it in. It wouldn’t be fun for Dallas to find itself so near a quasar.”

Maybe so, but speaking metaphorically, if it were a white hole, that might suggest central collections was actually doing its job, ejecting paperwork in a timely fashion.
Being a physics geek, I thought pretty much the same thing as Eric Berger of the Houston Chronicle.  Doesn't John Wiley Price know anything about astro-physics?  What a moron!  The physics-challenged Price did not understand that if the collections office where a white hole there would be no problem.  Jonah Goldberg is technically correct, the best kind of correct.  If the collections office where a white hole it would have been doing its job, collecting revenue from traffic tickets like it was designed to do while spitting out receipts.  Stick that in your big black 595-dollar J. Alan Sandblasted Lovat Mastadon Ivory pipe and smoke it Mr. Price!
 
Much like a black hole, infinite in his density, Judge Thomas Jones demanded Mr. Mayfield apologize for being a racist jerk.  When a news crew caught up with Judge Jones after the non-incident, Jones explained that people should be astronomically more aware of what they say in relation to race.  Ignoring of course that Mr. Mayfield said nothing about race or black people whatsoever, but that's really beside the point.  Jones went on to give examples to the news crew showing how there are many terms in our language based in racial insensitivity.  In my opinion, his most telling example was the difference between "angel-food cakes" and "devil's-fool cakes".  You see, "angel-food cakes are white" and "devil's-food cakes are black", proving beyond any doubt how our language is filled with intolerant racial connotations and overtones.
 
All this leads me to ask an important question.  Did the people of Dallas County actually elect these idiots?  I suppose racists elect racists but this is ridiculous.  If this is the level of discourse our elected officials have reverted to, and obviously they have, we are in a great deal of trouble in this country.  The people of Dallas County were actually paying Judge Thomas Jones and Dallas' Quanell-X, John Wiley Price to engage in one of the most retarded conversations on the tax payers time that I have ever heard.  The real black hole in this cosmic event was the space between the walls in that Commissioner's meeting.
 
The moral of the story?  Watch what you say in Dallas, Texas.  Especially when using racist terms out of the astro-physics dictionary.  John Wiley Price and Judge Thomas Jones will hunt you down and force an embarassing public apology before you can say "brown dwarf". 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Teen Terrorist Sobs Like a Little Girl During Gitmo Interrogations

The assorted news outlets revealed Tuesday a video of a teenaged terrorist detained for killing an American soldier crying like a little girl during interrogations at the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.  No doubt liberals around the country are demanding the terrorist be released immediately and sent home so he can reunite with the Taliban and kill more American soldiers.  Here are some excerpts from the FoxNews report:
"Help me," he cries repeatedly in despair.

The 10 minutes of video — selected by Omar Khadr's Canadian lawyers from more than seven hours of footage recorded by a camera hidden in a vent — shows Khadr weeping, his face buried in his hands, as he is questioned by Canadian intelligence agents over four days in 2003.

A Canadian Security Intelligence Services agent in the video grills Khadr about events leading up to his capture as an enemy combatant when he was 15. Khadr, a Canadian citizen, is accused of throwing a grenade that killed a U.S. Special Forces soldier during a 2002 firefight in Afghanistan. He was arrested after he was found in the rubble of a bombed-out compound — badly wounded and near death.

At one point in the interrogation, Khadr pulls off his orange prisoner shirt and shows the wounds he sustained in the firefight. He complains he cannot move his arms and says he had not received proper medical attention, despite requests.

"They look like they're healing well to me," the agent says of the injuries.

"No, I'm not. You're not here (at Guantanamo)," says Khadr, the son of an alleged Al Qaeda financier.

The agent later accuses Khadr of using his injuries and emotional state to avoid the interrogation. "No, you don't care about me," Khadr says.

Khadr also tells his interrogator that he was tortured while at the U.S. military detention center at the Bagram air base in Afghanistan, where he was first detained after his arrest in 2002. Later on in the tape, a distraught Khadr is seen rocking, his face in his hands.
Khadr is obviously just another Islamic fascist trying to make his way in the big world.  Cries of help?  Like how he helped the family of the American soldier he murdered on the battlefield in Afghanistan?  The agent interrogating this sniveling little monster called his bluff and was exactly right.  The teenaged terrorist was using his injuries and faked emotional state to avoid answering questions about his involvement in the attack and death of that soldier.
 
If you feel even the slightest bit sorry for Omar Khadr then you are in need of serious psychological treatment, and probably a slap across the face for good measure.  This terrorist is not just some kid who got himself caught in the wrong place at the wrong time.  He is an enemy combatant of the Taliban taken during battle after killing an American soldier as part of a terrorist attack on our forces and innocent civilians. 
 
The fact he even has a lawyer is an atrocity unto itself!  People who engage in the sort of actions Khadr was detained for have taken the step from human being to animal.  He no longer has any rights.  Khadr is an enemy of all peaceful and innocent people and he should have been executed on the battlefield instead of detained in the first place.  Now, thanks to the liberal geniuses in our Supreme Court, Khadr and all of the worst terrorists in the world being held at Guantanamo will receive lawyers and all the benefits of the American legal system.  Omar Khadr, murderer and member of the Taliban.  Coming to a neighborhood near you!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John Bolton: Iran and Middle-East Close to "Irreversible Turning Point"

After five years of negotiations and economic sanctions against Iran, the West has been rewarded in only one way: Iran is now five years closer to having the ability to launch a nuclear weapon.  Barack Obama and the State Department are on the same page when it comes to Iran.  We need another five years to negotiate and give strong incentives for Iran to halt its nuclear weapons program.  For liberals it's as if the last five years never happened.
 
As John Bolton states in his recent colum "Israel, Iran and the Bomb", there are many varying estimates on what the timetable is for Iran to have a fully operational nuclear weapons program with the capability to launch nuclear warheads.  The fact is that no one but the Islamic fascists ruling Iran know the timetable.  John McCain does not know, Barack Obama does not know, the Defense Department does not know, the State Department does not know, the President does not know, and even more shocking to us all... the EU does not know.  This November American voters decide whether Barack Obama or John McCain will be our next President.  The question then becomes: what are their plans for dealing with Iran's nuclear weapons program, assuming Iran has not already achieved their goals by that time?
 
Obama wants to sit across the table from the Ayatollah and Ahmadinejad in hopes of sprinkling fairy dust and happy thoughts on our enemies, much like we've attempted to do in the past five years but with one difference.  Obama aims to legitimize Iran even more by direct negotiations.  John McCain emphasizes our need for a powerful missile defense system.  I completely agree with that.  However, I am more interested in stopping Iran from ever having the capability of launching a nuclear weapon.  Out of the two candidates, McCain is at least thinking intelligently and responsibly where Iran is concerned.
 
This is where the driving point of John Bolton's column comes into the picture.  If no one else is going to stop Iran, Israel will.  Much more so than any other country, Israel cannot allow Iran to launch a nuclear missile.  These aren't the type of weapons that require the country firing them to hit a precise target.  A nuclear missile striking anywhere in Israel would be a catastrophe unlike any other.  The nuclear weapons of today aren't your grandfather's nuclear missiles.  Not by any measure.  A nuclear weapon's explosion in Israel would utterly devestate the country.  The next question:
What will the U.S. do if Israel decides to initiate military action? There was a time when the Bush administration might itself have seriously considered using force, but all public signs are that such a moment has passed.

Israel sees clearly what the next 12 months will bring, which is why ongoing U.S.-Israeli consultations could be dispositive. Israel told the Bush administration it would destroy North Korea's reactor in Syria in spring, 2007, and said it would not wait past summer's end to take action. And take action it did, seeing a Syrian nuclear capability, for all practical purposes Iran's agent on its northern border, as an existential threat. When the real source of the threat, not just a surrogate, nears the capacity for nuclear Holocaust, can anyone seriously doubt Israel's propensities, whatever the impact on gasoline prices?
Even though the United States could stop Iran permanently, it appears we aren't going to.  John Bolton makes a point that Americans need to seriously consider:  Israel will not be debating the price of gasoline when it comes to being faced with another Holocaust.  What they will do is defend themselves and destroy Iran's nuclear weapons program with a military strike.
 
The appropriate and necessary role of the United States is to cooperate fully with Israel when they decide to attack.  The more successful Israel is in taking care of Iran, the better off the entire world will be.  Not only that, the smoother the operations proceed the less negative rammifications we will have to endure during the fallout.  Israel will ask for our aid and support, but they won't ask for our permission.  Their nation does not sit halfway around the world from Iran like ours.  Stopping Iran is a fact on which their very existence rests.  Therefore, as John Bolton so directly asks:  What will the U.S. do if Israel decides to initiate military action?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama on Iraq: "This War Distracts Us"

More disgust for Iraq coming from Barack Obama today.  Yet again the Democrat nominee for President pushes his bag of crap on the American People, this time claiming that Iraq is a distraction from the real threats:
“This war distracts us from every threat that we face and so many opportunities we could seize,” Obama said. “By any measure, our single-minded and open-ended focus on Iraq is not a sound strategy for keeping America safe.”
Fortunately, the issue of Iraq is one which John McCain has not yet figured out how to stick his foot in his mouth: 
“Senator Obama will tell you we can’t win in Afghanistan without losing in Iraq. In fact, he has it exactly backwards,” McCain said in Albuquerque, N.M. “It is precisely the success of the surge in Iraq that shows us the way to succeed in Afghanistan.”
 
“Senator Obama is departing soon on a trip abroad that will include a fact-finding mission to Iraq and Afghanistan,” McCain said. “He is speaking today about his plans for Iraq and Afghanistan before he’s even left, before he has talked to General Petraeus, before he has seen the progress in Iraq, and before he has set foot in Afghanistan for the first time. In my experience … fact-finding missions usually work best the other way around: First you assess the facts on the ground, then you present a new strategy.”
Of course Senator McCain is quite correct.  Obama has not even talked to General Petraeus, outside of speaking down to the General during Senate committee hearings, and he's already formed his strategy for Iraq and Afghanistan.  General Petraeus is about to become the overall Commander of our Middle-East operations.  It would probably be a good idea for Obama to have a chat with him before making any decisions.  That would certainly be the Presidential thing to do.
 
John McCain made another excellent point in his repudiation of Obama's "strategy".  The success of the Surge in Iraq shows us how to proceed in Afghanistan.  That could be the most accurate statement I have ever seen McCain make.  My sarcasm aside, the statements you see here show the huge chasm between John McCain and Barack Obama when it comes to foreign policy and the duties of the Commander-in-Chief of our military.  If Obama spent as much time learning about leading our military as he did in Jeremiah Wright's racist Hamas-loving church, he still would not measure up to the experience, knowledge, and foresight shown by John McCain in this area.
 
Above all, foreign policy and military leadership are the two most frightening areas where the failure of Barack Obama is apparent.  Being Chicago's Jesse Jackson in the form of a "community organizer" does not make you prepared to lead our military and our country.  The proposition of removing forces from Iraq regardless of what General Petraeus reports is an extremely dangerous one and shows Barack Obama for what he is.  Incompetent and unqualified.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Iranian Officers Assume Command of Hezbollah on Lebanese Sannine Peak

Iran is ratcheting-up operations in Lebanon, this time appointing some of its officers to take over control of Hezbollah forces in the region. Will Israel actually do something besides place their military on high alert? Here's a thought: bomb them!
DEBKAfile’s military sources report that Israel has placed its military and air forces on its northern borders on high alert after Iran and Syria ignored Jerusalem’s warning, relayed to Washington, that the continued presence of Iranian, Syrian and Hizballah officers on the strategic Lebanese Sannine peak may spark a military clash.

Monday, July 14, two days ahead of the prisoner swap with Hizballah, Israel’s army spokesmen disclosed that Iranian officers had assumed command of Hizballah’s fighting units.
What is even more ominous about this report is that Iranian-controlled Hezbollah terrorists are now able to attack our Sixth Fleet.  Israel's military believes Hezbollah will commit to an assault from this area after the prisoner exchange is completed tomorrow.  The report linked above also predicts that Iran and Syria intend to carve-up Lebanon into strategic positions in preparation for a larger attack on Israel in the near future.
 
The Iranian, Syrian, and Hezbollah troop movements being witnessed today are a direct result of Ehud Olmert refusing our offer to aid in an all-out assault on Hezbollah during their take-over of Lebanon a few weeks ago.  The Israeli government decided to allow Hezbollah control of the entire country, which brought Iran and Syria into a position of great power in Lebanon.  Now the most dangerous Islamic fascist armies in the world have consolidated their hold over strategic positions on Israel's border favorable for a concerted attack on the Jewish nation.
 
This is what negotiation and appeasement of Islamic fascist terrorists will get you.  A lesson Israel is in the process of re-learning today.  The next few months are going to be painful.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama Changes Policy on Jerusalem, No Longer the "Undivided Capital" of Israel

Barack Obama has once again changed a policy.  This time he has decided to stab the Jews in the back after giving that beautifully pandered speech to AIPAC.  Obama stated in his address to AIPAC that "Jersusalem is the undivided capital of Israel" in a shallow attempt to reassure Jewish voters that he will stand by Israel over his support of the Palestinians.  Today Barack Obama is singing a different tune:
"You know, the truth is that this was an example where we had some poor phrasing in the speech, and we immediately tried to correct the interpretation that was given," Obama stated yesterday during an interview on CNN's show, "Fareed Zakaria – GPS."

"The point we were simply making was, is that we don't want barbed wire running through Jerusalem, similar to the way it was prior to the '67 war, that it is possible for us to create a Jerusalem that is cohesive and coherent. I was not trying to predetermine what are essentially final-status issues."
Here's some more the day after his speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC):
"Well, obviously, it's going to be up to the parties to negotiate a range of these issues. And Jerusalem will be part of those negotiations," he said in response to a question about whether Palestinians have a legitimate claim to the city.

Obama said "as a practical matter, it would be very difficult to execute" a division of the city. "And I think that it is smart for us to, to work through a system in which everybody has access to the extraordinary religious sites in Old Jerusalem but that Israel has a legitimate claim on that city."
So even though Obama believes it would be difficult to execute a division of Jerusalem, he still feels it's necessary to work through a system which divides Jerusalem.  That certainly doesn't sound like the Barack Obama I know.  Oh wait, yes it does.  None of this should come as a surprise to Jewish voters here in America, or Jews living in Israel.
 
Obama has a well-known affinity for the Palestinian's invasion of Israel.  He believes so much in their cause that he appointed Daniel Kurtzer as his advisor on Israeli-Palestinian affairs, a man who fully advocates the dividing of Jerusalem between the Jews and Palestinians.  After elected President, it is Obama's intention to appoint Kurtzer as the top U.S. broker on the issue of Arab-Israeli conflict.  Here is what Kurtzer had to say about Jerusalem:
"It will be impossible to make progress on serious peace talks without putting the future of Jerusalem on the table," adviser Daniel Kurtzer said as recently as last month at a conference organized by the Jewish People Policy Planning Institute, or JPPPI.
It doesn't appear as though Obama intends for Jerusalem to remain an "undivided capital".  The fact is that Obama through the Jews under the bus before he ever spoke to AIPAC.  Barack Obama had, nor has, any intention of supporting Israel over the Palestinian terrorists.  The only Jews supporting Obama are the typical liberal self-hating Jews who currently populate the Democrat Party.  These people are like any other liberal who thinks we should negotiate and understand the Palestinians.  If stupid Westerners could simply comprehend the complex issues behind why the Palestinians crack the heads open of Jewish babies using rocks we would see the light and come to support the Palestinian terrorist cause against the evil Israeli empire.
 
At no time is Barack Obama to be trusted concerning foreign policy with Israel.  He has already lied to Jewish voters once and he won't think twice about doing so again.  The man will say whatever is necessary to whichever group he is speaking to at the moment.  After appeasing AIPAC he went right back to his usual policy of supporting Palestinian terrorists such as Mahmoud Abbas and the Fatah movement.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

T. Boone Pickins - Blowing in the Wind

Over the past couple of weeks you may have been subjected to commercials from former oilman T. Boone Pickens.  For those of you assaulted with Mr. Pickens newfound faith in green energy, you have my sympathies.  After making his first billion dollars in the oil industry, Pickens now feels the hope and change blowing across the nation from the environmental movement and is putting your money into wind energy.
 
This reformed destroyer of the environment is now putting billions of dollars into the world's largest wind farm in Texas.  Pickens feels the U.S. needs to ween itself off fossil fuels and instead blow wind.  All the newfound wind energy will free up natural gas to power electric cars thereby removing our addiction to oil.
 
Believe it or not, there's one small problem aside from the obvious silliness of filling the country up with windmills.  The use of your tax dollars.  Converting the country into using a strong breeze instead of oil required hundreds of billions of dollars in investemnts.  That is besides the huge investment required for converting the transportation infrastructure.  Even Mr. Pickens does not have the ridiculous amonts of money needed to cover these costs.
 
This leaves us with what ol' T. Boone is not telling you in all his interviews, commercials on TV and radio, and on his super-cool website.  Somebody has to pay for it.  That body is the American People.  In fact, you already are paying for it!  Read below:
For 31 years, the federal government has subsidized new wind and solar projects. A tax break that provides up to 30 cents on every dollar it costs to build solar facilities and one for operating wind turbines are set to expire this year. The Senate last week voted to renew them.
Now that T. Boone Pickens has jumped on the green bandwagon with dreams of covering the nation in windmills, costing hundreds of billions of dollars that Pickens and his investors do not have, you can bet those subsidies will increase dramatically.  In short, if Mr. Pickens cannot convince people to give him money directly he will simply use the U.S. government to take the money from you by force of taxes.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More Than 100 Taliban Attack Small U.S. Outpost in Wanat, Afghanistan

More than 100 Taliban terrorists attacked the small U.S. outpost in Wanat, breaching the walls and allowing them to assault our soldiers from the inside.  Our soldiers mounted a counter-attack killing 40 of the enemy.  The report states the fighting lasted most of the day.  Initially outnumbered and attacked from all sides, and our soldiers still killed at least 40 Taliban and repelled the now failed assault.
 
The report also cites U.S. leaders considering the draw-down of soldiers in Iraq for redeployment to Afghanistan; upwards of 10,000.  It appears we need those extra soldiers in Afghanistan now more than ever.  The Taliban attacks are becoming more frequent and better coordinated.
 
I will call for it until it is done.  The border between Afghanistan and Pakistan needs to be secured by whatever means necessary.  As long as the Taliban and al-Qaeda are allowed to go back and forth into Pakistan, with the Pakistani government signing peace treaties and giving them safe haven, this will continue.  A much larger U.S. presence is needed in Afghanistan immediately, regardless of where the soldiers are transferred from.  It is apparent that Pakistan cannot and will not fight the Taliban within their own country.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

AP: Global Warming Allows Russia to Stake Claim to Arctic Resources

The Associate Mess reported Monday that Russia is moving a submarine destroyer and a missile cruiser to the Arctic to patrol and provide security for its fishermen.  The AP states that Russia is moving to "stake its claim to resources that are increasingly accessible as global warming melts Arctic ice."  This refers to an underground mountain range believed to hold vast amounts of oil and natural gas.  Global warming; the one piece of good news in this entire article.
 
Apparently Norway is keeping Russain fishermen from using waters blocked by a 1982 UN treaty which Russia does not recognize to begin with.  So the Russian warships are supposedly going to blaze a path through that on their way to conquer more areas of the North Pole.  I hope Mrs. Claus has cookies and milk waiting for them.
 
The Russians say there "is nothing aggressive in it", but we all know better.  Russia isn't sending powerful warships such as submarine destroyers and missile cruisers to help fishermen go around waters blocked by a treaty they don't even recognize.  I don't seem to remember reading any reports of Norwegian submarines attacking Russian fishermen, thereby requiring the protection of submarine destroyers.
 
Meanwhile, back here in the United States our Congress still rests their big fat rear-ends on a moratorium against more exploration and drilling while Americans pay higher and higher prices for fuel and energy.  Our so-called "representatives" are locked in debate over offshore production along with drilling in ANWR, totally ignoring the trillions of barrels of oil sitting right beneath our feet in the Green River and Bakken reserves.  On top of it all we now get to sit idly by while the Russians, aided by global warming, take over the North Pole and all its natural resources through military force which has nothing to confront it, other than polar bears of course
 
Have I mentioned that Congress has a 9% approval rating?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's New Plan for Iraq, Same As the Current Plan for Iraq

Barack Obama wrote an op-ed piece in the New York Times on Monday outlining his well thought-out plan for withdrawal from Iraq.  After reading the entire column, a grueling five minutes of my life that I will never get back, one thing became very clear.  Obama's plan for Iraq is already ocurring!
 
President Bush is already preparing to withdraw significant numbers of soldiers from Iraq, and he isn't taking two years like the Obama plan calls for.  Obama's plan calls for a large portion of the troops in Iraq to be redeployed to Afghanistan in order to combat the increasing threat of the Taliban and al-Qaeda pouring over the Afghan-Pakistan border.  That's funny.  President Bush is doing the same thing, but in 45-days!  Again, a great deal sooner than Obama's two years.
 
In all of Obama's brilliance and divine splendor he seems to have missed something.  By all credible accounts we have achieved victory in Iraq.  I guess Barack didn't get the memo.  Our soldiers have made historical progress in removing Saddam Hussein along with his 550 tons of yellow-cake uranium, and have given the Iraqis the ability to manage their own destinies through the democratic election of what is now a solid government with its own military and police forces.  Is it absolutely perfect like the Democrats are demanding while all along calling for retreat?  No; and neither is our own country.  It is however exactly what we set out to accomplish.  Maybe if Barack Obama got his news from sources running missions with our soldiers on the ground in Iraq instead of The New Republic, DailyKos, the Huffington Post, and the New York Times he would know the facts instead of making them up as he goes along.
 
Everything Obama wants to do concerning Iraq has either already happened or is now happening on a much shorter timetable.  So where is the great revelation from The New Messiah in his New York Times op-ed piece?  There isn't one.  The mission in Iraq will not be completed until Obama says it's completed and not one second before.
 
One thing I should admit:  I completely agree with Obama on moving more soldiers into Afghanistan.  Apparently so does President Bush and General Petraeus.  Versus waiting on Obama to shine down the light of Heaven and give his permission; President Bush is going to go ahead and do it without Obama's inspired intervention.  Which, by the way, has been the plan all along!  All Barack Obama did is re-word the current plan for Iraq into a nice little package his adoring throngs are able to swallow without choking on how wrong they have been about Iraq since the start of the war.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Latest Atrocities from The Religion of Submission

7/13/2008 (Oruzgan, Afghanistan) - A suicide attack near a busy market leaves over two dozen people dead.

7/12/2008 (Tirah, Pakistan) - Two women are among seven people killed in clashes between rival Islamist groups.

7/12/2008 (Grozny, Chechnya) - Mujahideen detonate a bomb hidden in a trash can, killing one person.

7/12/2008 (Bargi Matal, Afghanistan) - A youth is killed defending his village from a Taliban attack.

7/12/2008 (Hangu, Pakistan) - Sixteen pro-government tribesmen are killed by the Taliban, eight by execution.

7/12/2008 (Tal Afar, Iraq) - The bodies of seven people kidnapped by Islamic terrorists are discovered.
 
More from the peace-loving Islamic fascists in the War Against Western Civilization.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Syrian Dictator Throws Fit at Sarkozy's Mid-East Peace Party

French president Nicolas Sarkozy organized a jovial photo-op with Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian Authority chairman Mahmoud Abbas to launch his Mediterranean union debut in Paris Sunday, July 13, attended by 40 leaders.

The first sour note came from Syrian president Bashar Assad, who was reinstated by Sarkozy’s invitation on the international stage. He and foreign minister Walid Mualem walked out as Olmert entered to the hall to deliver a speech. Earlier, Assad had his security men jostle Israel correspondents and TV cameras out of his way as he swept past. And he firmly rejected Sarkozy’s effort to arrange a meeting with the Israeli prime minister and announced that peace with Israel could take another two years.

This reply followed Olmert’s optimistic statement to reporters: “We have never been as close to an accord as we are today.”

Abbas and Sarkozy beamed their approval of Olmert’s statement and co-chairman Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak called on Israel and the Palestinians to work harder for a peace deal to pave the way for a Palestinian state.

Behind the bonhomie, DEBKAfile’s Middle East sources report that Abbas’ Fatah and its rival, the rejectionist Palestinian Hamas, have never been so close to a peace accord as they are today, largely due to the efforts of Mubarak himself. Success in this effort would write finis to the US-sponsored Palestinian peace track with Israel.

This is the real purpose of the lengthy talks the Hamas delegations from Gaza and Damascus have been holding in Cairo. According to our sources, the rival factions have covered considerable ground:

1. Hamas has agreed to relinquish its rule of the Gaza Strip and accept a government manned by nonpartisan technocrats.

2. Parliamentary and presidential elections will be held in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, the date subject to the Hamas proviso that it is admitted to the Palestinian Liberation Organization leadership under a major structural reform.

3. Hamas and Fatah have agreed to Egyptian military forces’ deployment in the Gaza Strip to organize and train Palestinian security and intelligence bodies.

Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah, Hamas and Egypt agreed to leave Israel out in the cold and present the Palestinian reunion as a fait accompli. They reckoned that Israel would swallow the deal if captive Israeli soldier Gilead Shalit were freed. In any case, the prime minister Olmert is not expected to survive the corruption scandals gathering over his head.

The Palestinians groups and Cairo are moving forward as though George W. Bush, whose two-state solution was one of the high points of his international policy, had already left the White House.
 
Perfect!  Now Egypt gets to invade Israel as well as the Palestinians.  This is truly the most nonsensical undertaking Ehud Olmert of Israel has committed himself to during his tenure as Prime Minister.  Bashir Assad however did not appear to be as jovial as the rest of the merry band of politicians and diplomats in Paris.  For Syria, peace with Israel will apparently take a lot longer than Olmert expected.  Who could have seen that coming?
 
All this insanity by Israel was of course engaged in without U.S. support or approval from the White House.  The report above suggests this entire spectacle took place as if President Bush "had already left the White House".  Since Olmert allowing Hezbollah to conquer Lebanon while refusing U.S. support to destroy the terror group in addition to his peace talks with Syria, the Israeli government has fallen out of favor with the Bush Administration.  This is all well and good as far as I'm concerned.  I do not want my country to have any part of negotiations with our Islamic fascist enemies.  If Olmert wants to take Israel down the road of further appeasement of terrorists, he can do it without the United States.
 
Personally, I'm still in favor of the United States supporting an Israeli attack on Iran's nuclear weapons facilities.  However, until the Israeli government decides to come to its senses regarding other issues that is about all the support I want to give them at this point.  The Israeli government lead by Olmert chooses to embrace madness over reason.  Again, they can do that without involving my country.  I very much support Israel as a nation; I won't support their government's continued attempts at suicide.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive