About Me

Name: Cary Wesberry
Email: carywesberry@sbcglobal.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Russia Declares Break-Away Criminal Provinces of Georgia as Independent States!

Russia declared Abkhazia and South Ossetia independent from Georgia, long enough for them to be subsumed by the New Soviet Union.  As punishment, the "international community" gives Moscow a stern talking-to.
Russia’s president backed independence claims of two breakaway republics in Georgia today, a dramatic move that reignited tensions between the two countries which have fought a brief but bloody war over the disputed territories. 

The Government of Mikhail Saakashvili, the Georgian president, called the declaration a de facto annexation of the territories of Abkhazia and South Ossetia, and compared the decision to Nazi Germany’s carving up of Czechoslovakia in 1938, which led to the outbreak of the Second World War.

Dimitry Medvedev further increased tensions by accusing the United States of shipping arms to Georgia on naval vessels in the Black Sea port of Poti.

Asked if Russia was mounting a blockade of ships off Poti Medvedev replied:“There is no blockade. Any ship can get in, American and others are bringing in humanitarian cargoes.

“And what the Americans call humanitarian cargoes - of course, they are bringing in weapons.”

The American warship USS McFaul was due to dock in Poti tomorrow to deliver humanitarian aid there. Other US naval vessels are due in the same area in the next few days.

Georgia accused its giant neighbour of seeking to provoke renewed fighting, which would allow its armoured divisions to move around the capital Tblisi.

But the leaders of the two tiny would-be states hailed Mr Medvedev’s decision to back their bids for independence as “historic,” and there were scenes of celebration inside their main towns.

"I have signed decrees on the recognition of the independence of South Ossetia and Abkhazia," Mr Medvedev said in a televised address. "Russia calls on other states to follow its example."

Instead, the Russian declaration ran into a barrage of international condemnation.

Britain was among the first western states to reject the unilateral Russian move. David Miliband, the Foreign Secretary, said Russia’s decision “further inflames an already tense situation” and vowed to build the “widest possible coalition against Russian aggression in Georgia".

He said: “Today’s announcement by President Medvedev that Russia will recognise South Ossetia and Abkhazia is unjustifiable and unacceptable. It will also not work.
Yes indeed, the world is going straight to Hell; sans the handbasket, do not pass Purgatory, do not collect a chance for redemption. 
 
The lily-white cowards in Great Britain admonished Russia for making a declaration which "further inflames an already tense situation".  Such strong language from the pansy Foreigner Secretary of not-so-Great Britain.  Further inflames?  Russia invaded Georgia!  The only thing the Communists "inflamed" was the entire Georgian countryside.
 
I suppose it is best we do nothing for Georgia.  If we help them the way we are helping Israel there would not be a single Georgian left in the world today.  Leaving Georgia to fend for itself has to be better than actually giving support and comfort to the enemy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Israeli Government Agrees to Not Attack Iran In Exchange for X-Band Radar System

The current government of Israel is working hard to inflict as much damage as they can on their own country before the Jews throw them out of office.  It is well past time for the Jews of Israel to take to the streets and physically remove Olmert, Livni, and Barak from their positions and place them in prison where they belong.
 
In addition to handing over Jerusalem to the Palestinian monsters, Israel has now agreed to not attack Iran's nuclear weapons facilities without U.S. permission.  I have never wanted John McCain to be President more than I do right now. 
The Olmert-Livni-Barak government is apparently maneuvering to stand down on Iran, and they'd like the US to be blamed for their timidity. A careful reading of a bizarre article in Sunday's edition of Ha'aretz brings this point home clearly.

The report details Israel's recent agreement with the US to deploy the X-Band high powered early warning radar system in Israel. The system will be manned by a team of three US military personnel from a trailer somewhere in the Negev.

The US's willingness to deploy the system is largely the consequence of ardent lobbying efforts by US Congressman Mark Kirk. Kirk's successful push for the deployment of the X-Band system in Israel is a great boon for the country's defensive capabilities. The X-Band system can detect incoming missiles from 500-600 miles. Currently, Israel's early warning system is only able to detect missiles from 100 miles out. The earlier detection capacity means that in the event of an Iranian attack, Israel's Arrow missiles will be able to intercept and destroy incoming missiles before they reach Israeli territory and so even their debris will fall outside the country.

BUT ACCORDING to unnamed Israeli "defense officials" who spoke with Ha'aretz, the price that Israel will be forced to pay for this increased defensive capacity is prohibitive. Those "defense officials" claim that the US forced Israel to agree that in exchange for the X-Band system, Israel will not attack Iran either preemptively or retroactively without US permission, because were Israel to attack Iran, the three American guys and their trailer could become a target for an Iranian missile.

If Ha'aretz and the "defense officials" are right, then that means that Defense Minister Ehud Barak - who concluded the deal with US Defense Secretary Robert Gates during his visit to Washington last month - agreed to concede Israel's right to take whatever action it deems necessary to prevent its national destruction. Barak conceded Israel's right to prevent its own annihilation in exchange for three guys and a trailer and the capacity to live with a greater sense of security under Iranian nuclear threat. This sense of security will last for as long as Iran doesn't develop satellite-based warheads or for as long as Iran doesn't prove the X-Band radar or the Arrow 3 missiles incapable of actually intercepting incoming nuclear warheads.
January, hopefully with a John McCain Presidency, cannot come soon enough.  Condi Rice, Robert Gates, and George Bush are making a misguided and dangerous mistake in trusting our enemies with any sort of peace agreement where Israel is concerned.  These people are no students of history.  Appeasement has never once achieved success for those who give-in, and it never will.  There is nothing whatsoever in all of history to suggest that the Bush\Olmert Administrations' dismantling of Israel in favor of the Palestinian terrorists and Iranian fascists will do anything other than get us more dead Jews. 
 
If you want to see examples of doing evil in the name of good, then you need look no further than Israel.  It is beyond pathetic how no one in American media, not even conservative talk radio, reports on our Administration's destructive endeavors in Israel.  Every person who sits behind a camera or a microphone in America should be ashamed of themselves to the point of not having a job.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Olmert/Livni Prepared to Give Up Well Over 90% of Judea and Samaria to Palestinians

Our incompetent Secretary of State, Condi Rice, continues full speed ahead with the destruction of Israel.  Between Olmert, Livni, and Rice there will soon be little of Israel left in the Middle-East for the Palestinians and Iranians to fight against.  Apparently our plan for ending the violence in the Middle-East is to remove the Jews for our enemies so they don't have to.
(IsraelNN.com) Negotiations between Israel and PA continue at a "crazy" pace, agreement on dividing Jerusalem is "closer than ever," and U.S. Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice is pushing for a nearly-complete agreement on a Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria by January. So reports Aaron Klein of WorldNetDaily (WND).

Secretary Rice, completing a visit to the region today (Tuesday), has been pressing Israel to sign a document by the end of the year that would divide Jerusalem. Rice says Israel must agree to a Palestinian state capital in Jerusalem - Israel's own capital - and a full Palestinian state in Judea, Samaria and Gaza.

Despite official Israeli government denials, Jerusalem is thus very much on the negotiating table. The Shas Party, which has said it would quit the government if Jerusalem were to be negotiated, remains firmly in the government coalition.

The Rice Compromise: Israel Remains in Jerusalem for 1-5 Years
Klein quotes top diplomatic sources involved in the talks as saying that Rice has been pushing for a "compromise" between Israel and the PA that would involve Israel's withdrawal from eastern Jerusalem, including the Old City, within one to five years.

The Israeli team, led by Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, is willing to conclude an agreement on a Palestinian state by the end of the year, but wants to leave talks to decide the fate of Jerusalem for a later date. The PA team, however, wants a deal by January on all core issues, including the Holy City.

The Rice compromise, the sources told WND, asks Israeli leaders to bend and agree to promise sections of Jerusalem to the PA - but not to actually withdraw before one to five years have passed. U.S. President George W. Bush would then, just days before his term in office ends, issue an official letter guaranteeing U.S. support for the agreement.

High Intensity Talks
WND's Klein quoted an unnamed Palestinian Authority negotiator saying that the intensity and frequency of Israeli-Palestinian talks in recent weeks have been "crazy," and that the sides have been meeting on a daily basis, usually at the highest levels. The negotiator further said Jerusalem is being discussed by both sides, and that the two teams are "closer than ever" on coming to an agreement on the status of the city. "This claim was verified to WND by other diplomatic sources involved in the negotiations," Klein wrote.

Reports of the past few months say that the Olmert-Livni negotiators are prepared to give up well over 90% of Judea and Samaria, as well as land for a "safe passage" between those areas and Gaza. This, despite the results of the withdrawal from Gaza three years ago, which include the takeover of the area by Hamas and incessant rocket attacks on nearby Israeli areas.
If Ehud Olmert does what he wants to do and gives up Jerusalem to the enemy, one of two things will occur.  It will be the beginning of the end for the Jews, or they will finally rise-up against their corrupted pro-Palestinian government and reclaim what is theirs.  I'm praying for the latter.  Time is obviously running out.
 
What the Bush Administration is provoking within Israel is criminal.  Whatever happened to not negotiating with terrorists?  Rice's liberalizing of the war in Israel will lead straight to horror and chaos for our strongest ally in the world.  These negotiations are suicidal for both Israel and the United States.  I knew things were going downhill rapidly when Israel did nothing to stop Hezbollah from conquering Lebanon.  The Syrian army is surrounding Israel.  The Palestinian enemy is tightening the noose and our own government is helping them take control of Jerusalem.
 
The near unthinkable outcome approaching the Jews cannot become reality.  When Jerusalem falls to the Palestinians, it falls to Iran and Syria; our enemies will be unified and winning the War Against Islamic Fascists will be in serious doubt.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

John Edwards: A Story of Redemption

Why am I reminded of Jim Baker of "Jim and Tammy Fae Baker" fame?  "Oh Lord I have sinned against you!"  Should America forgive John Edwards?  No doubt he has repented and is in the process of atoning for his sins.  It's probably not even his fault.  Maybe John Edwards has simply been attending the wrong church all these years.  Perhaps the filthy scumbag didn't even know what he was doing was wrong until just a week or so ago.
 
This is America!  We love the celebrity fall, and we love a celebrity redemption.  A true success story; that's John Edwards.  Now, let's stick him in front of a camera and get him to say something patriotic!
Many are bitter and disillusioned after swallowing his lies about his affair with a campaign staffer and vouching for his credibility with friends and journalists.

Some ignore his plaintive phone entreaties and don't call back - even when Edwards leaves follow-up messages. A few return his calls - and give him a piece of their angry minds.

When Edwards reached one longtime confidant asking for advice, he was cut off with a terse: "I don't want you to call me again."

The conversation ended abruptly.
 
"I let you down, and I'm sorry," is a common refrain of these messages, said another top ex-assistant on the receiving end of one of the calls.

"It was kind of pathetic, to tell you the truth," said the ex-aide, who said he didn't return the call and doesn't expect to speak to his former boss again.
Obviously John Edwards' former staff members don't understand their duty to forgive and welcome this adulterous piece of human garbage back into their lives.  What is wrong with these people!?!?!?  It is almost as if they don't believe John Edwards is telling the truth.  Cynics.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Reverence" Is Out, Old White Guys Are In

Obama’s choice of Washington insider Joe Biden is only one sign that the Messiah of Hope and Change is really just a Politician with Slogans. One of the more revealing statements by a senior Obama adviser reveals how Barry has grown “impatient” with his campaign staff who actually care about his, apparently temporary, boring, sloganny rhetoric meant to simply fool the bitter and clingy.

The candidate of change went with the status quo:

A senior Obama adviser, speaking on condition of anonymity, said his boss has expressed impatience with what he calls a “reverence” inside his campaign for his message of change and new politics. In other words, Obama is willing — even eager — to risk what got him this far if it gets him to the White House.

Prior to the Obama-Biden statement in Springfield today, Major Garrett noted that it appears Obama is willing to “sacrifice” his original message about change. That’s generous. I would suggest it’s not a sacrifice at all—but a simple revealing of the Real Barack Obama and one more sign that The One is like All the Others.
A "reverence"?  So those working for the Obama campaign are indeed the quasi-religious socialist cult I thought they were!  The New Messiah's minions have a "reverence" for His words.  A reverence.  And Obama has a problem with this?  All he's wanted from the beginning are millions of brainwashed like-minded disciples.  Now that Obama has what he wanted, at least from the inner circle, it's still not what he wants.
 
Tammy's right of course.  The public is catching on to the scam and now Barack must find a new angle.  Those who live in reverence of Obama's special brand of hope and change are becoming a liability.  The more people see The New Messiah for what he is, the more they see another radicalized liberal Senator with zero reverence for his country who possesses nothing resembling credentials for the Presidency.
 
Obama's answer to America on the question of experience?  Find some old nutty white guy from the Senate and throw him on the ticket.  The New Messiah fell into an old trap.  Above even a liberal's ideology is their desire for control.  Whatever must be done for Obama to win the White House, as he perceives the requirement, will be done.  Barack Obama will pick up a gun and go hunting with a group of diehard NRA members if it will get him elected.  Barack Obama would shoot a stinking polar bear dead in its tracks without thinking twice if it would get him the White House.  I could go on and on, but I think you get the point... at least you do if you aren't a liberal idiot.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mexican Drug Cartels Give Permission to Hit U.S. Targets

The Mexican drug cartels, aided greatly by our open and undefended southern border, seem to protect their own interests much more successfully than Homeland Security secures the sovereignty of our nation and lives of our loved ones:
EL PASO, Texas — Security is being heightened along the southern U.S. border because of a threat that warring Mexican cartels may send hit men into the United States, authorities said Monday.

Law enforcement officials would not discuss specific security measures being taken at the ports of entry, along the border or in the city of El Paso, Texas.

"We received credible information that drug cartels in Mexico have given permission to hit targets on the U.S. side of the border," El Paso police spokesman Officer Chris Mears said.

Authorities learned of the threat last week.

U.S. Customs and Border Protection Chief Officer Rick Lopez said: "CBP is on heightened alert ever since we became aware of the threats in Mexico."

U.S. Border Patrol spokesman Doug Mosier said officials "are reinforcing the importance of vigilance."

Drug cartel violence has claimed thousands of lives in Mexico this year. Nearly 800 people have been killed in Ciudad Juarez, a hardscrabble city of about 1.3 million people across the Rio Grande from El Paso.

The cartels, battling one another and the Mexican government for supremacy and control of lucrative drug and human smuggling routes, have become brazen in their attacks in recent months.

In Juarez this month, masked gunmen stormed a drug and alcohol rehabilitation center and killed eight people. Days later, Red Cross workers stopped treating gunshot victims for several hours after receiving death threats over Red Cross radios. The Red Cross had already stopped responding to emergency calls after 10 p.m. because of security concerns.

Law enforcement officials this year in New Mexico and Texas said they had received a purported cartel hit list identifying 15 to 20 potential targets in those states. Mears said the latest threat contained no specific targets.

The deadly wave of shootings and a rise in kidnappings for ransom in Mexico has prompted some of its citizens, including police officers and a prosecutor, to seek asylum in the U.S.

While the ongoing cartel war has been largely contained in Mexico, more than two dozen gunshot victims have been taken for medical treatment in El Paso, prompting security lockdowns at the county hospital.

Lopez said agents working at the ports, where those gunshot victims have been taken before coming into the U.S., are taking extra security precautions. Ambulances transporting gunshot victims are already being escorted by local law enforcement to the hospital, he said.
No worries!  I'm sure Michael Chertoff is hard at work making sure not one American Citizen is taken down due to the latest proclamation from the Mexican drug cartels.  After all, it's a 2,000-mile long border.  There's no way every Mexican assassin can cross all points along the border, at the same time, all the time.  See?  There's hope!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russian Troops Selling Loot in Georgia

The Russians steal it, then sell it.  Thuggery:
Georgian residents inspect the damage in Gori: Georgia conflict: Russian troops accused of selling loot
Georgian residents inspect the scraps of their homes, obviously a military target

Georgian civilians leaving Gali, a predominantly Georgian town within the breakaway province of Abkhazia, spoke with wonder of a bazaar bristling with everything from US army boots to plasma televisions and even sophisticated radar equipment. The men peddling the goods were all Russian soldiers, they said.

Russian soldiers have a reputation for entrepreneurship in the midst of battle. Over 14 years of intermittent conflict in Chechnya, many officers made considerable fortunes from selling arms to Chechen rebels.

The market spirit seemed to strike again as Russian troops began a pull out from undisputed Georgian territory it appears they took more than just souvenirs with them as they departed.

Shortly after 150 military lorries withdrew from western Georgia into Abkhazia, where Moscow has long backed the province's rebels, residents say market stalls began to spring up in Gali, a garrison town close to the Georgian frontier.

"It was amazing," said Nano Jaisashvili, a greengrocer from Gali. "They were selling clothes, binoculars, microwaves, laptops. We've never seen anything like it in Abkhazia. My neighbour bought a $500 (£250) fridge for 1,000 roubles (£20)."

Georgian police manning their side of the Inguri River, which separates Abkhazia from Georgia proper, begged fellow countrymen crossing the bridge that spanned the water to shun the market.

"Not a single Georgian should buy anything from there," the officer-in-charge said. "Remember that, while things might be cheap, they were stolen from your brothers and sisters."

A Russian officer commanding the border post denied the existence of the market.

"I have been here non-stop for several days and I would have seen them bringing over all these things," he said. "Russian soldiers do not loot and those that do we hand them straight to the prosecutor's office to face charges."

The Daily Telegraph was unable to confirm existence of the market after it was denied permission to enter Abkhazia.

But Russia's claims of scrupulous probity when it comes to the spoils of war seemed a little tendentious at two Georgian military bases that The Daily Telegraph visited yesterday.

At the army camp of Senaki, built by the US and perhaps the most advanced in the country, storage facilities by a runway had been stripped bare by the retreating Russians.

Office equipment from the barracks, where several windows had been blown out, had also been ransacked.

Fearing Russian booby-traps, Georgian soldiers were too scared to take proper possession of the base. Instead a herd of cows was set loose on the lawns in a rudimentary attempt at mine clearance. A Russian missile launcher dangled temptingly from a bush, but no-one dared touch it for fears it might explode.

Georgian concerns of Russian sabotage appear to have been borne out after a fuel train struck a suspected mine near Gori, a strategic town near the border with South Ossetia, Georgia's other breakaway region and the scene of the fiercest fighting during the five-day war. The explosion derailed 20 oil wagons, scattering them over a wide area, but caused no casualties.

At the naval base of Poti, another herd of cows roamed through rubble and debris left by Russian bombs. Russian troops occupied the port for several days, spending most of their time blowing up warships and coastguard vessels. The twisted and partially submerged wrecks lay scattered across the Black Sea harbour, where a film of oil coated the surface of the water.

Damaged furniture, partially documents and stationery strewn across the offices of the harbourmaster and the coastguard headquarters bore testament to frenzied looting. Computers had been prized from their sockets, patches of dirt on kitchen walls showed where fridges once stood and office doors had large holes in them.

Scorch marks caused by dynamite were visible on the door of a safe room and the safes inside had been cleared of valuable. In a nearby bathroom, the lavatory had been ripped from the wall and spirited away.

"One has to wonder if the Russians would even know how to use it," Tengiz Babunashvili, the commander of the port's radar facility, remarked bitterly."
 
One does indeed wonder, Commander Babunashvili.  Follow the link above to continue reading the report.  Let's take some time remind ourselves of what the Russian army has done to Georgia over the last few weeks; just for nostaligic purposes if nothing else.  In no particular order...
 
Russia literally set fire to the countryside using flammable devices dropped from helicopters into Georgia's forests.  They rounded up civilians and threw them into ready-made concentration camps, and those were lucky ones who Russia didn't simply murder on the spot.  Russia used illegal cluster bombs in order to shred civilians into itty-bitty pieces.  The invaders blew-up and otherwise destroyed as many civilian houses and apartments as they could, including the buildings used to provide basic social services to the population.  When the Russians evacuated an area, they placed landmines as a parting gift for all the little children.  Using their vastly superior numbers, Russia physically carved Georgia in half to take as their own, and have cut-off or occupied Georgia's energy supply and natural resources.  The Russians repeatedly lied about their commitment to ceasefires which they previously agreed to.  During the invasion of Georgia, Moscow threatened to fire nuclear missiles at both Poland and Ukraine if they dared to be brought under our missile defense net to protect themselves from Iran.  And to top it all off, the Communist pigs who invaded Georgia looted and pillaged every thing of value they could get their filthy little hands on and proceeded to hock the stolen property in the regions conquered, which are still under Russian occupation today.
 
Feel free to let me know if I missed anything.  Russia committed so many atrocities during their invasion of Georgia that it's hard to keep up with them all.
 
"Invasion" of Georgia?  No.  It is much more like the rape and domination of a once-free nation.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Train Carrying Oil Exports Blown-Up Outside of Gori, Georgia

Surely the Russian "peacekeepers" had nothing to do with this:
The incident occured in the village of Skra, near an abandoned Georgian military base about 5 km (3 miles) west of Gori. 

The rail route is a vital trade route for oil exports from Azerbaijan to European markets.

The extent of the damage was not immediately clear.

Russian troops left Gori, a key town in the Russia-Georgia conflict over breakaway South Ossetia, on Friday after a 10-day occupation. However they have faced international criticism for insisting on maintaining a large military presence in checkpoints in the area in defiance of a ceasefire agreement.

Under the terms of the truce, Russian and Georgian forces were supposed to retreat to positions held before fighting erupted on August 7.

For Russia, that meant withdrawing battle troops not only out of Georgia, but also out of South Ossetia, where the Kremlin has financially supported and probably armed a rebel government that broke away from Tbilisi's control in 1992.

However, Moscow insists it needs to take precautions to protect its citizens in the breakaway territory from further attacks from Georgia.

Georgian Interior Ministry spokesman Shota Utiashvili told Reuters: "According to very preliminary information, a train carrying fuel exploded on the railway, which we think was mined."

There was no independent confirmation of Utiashvili's comments.

Emergency services managed to unhitch 19 wagons and move them away from the fire, averting possible further explosions.

"We should find out first how big the fire is and how soon it will be extinguished, in order to assess the damage," said Georgian Prime Minister Lado Gurgenidze. "But the railway is vital, not just for the Georgian economy but for the economies of neighbouring countries."
The line runs through the capital Tbilisi before splitting in three and running to the Black Sea ports of Poti and Batumi and southwest to just short of the Turkish border.

On Aug. 16, an explosion downed a bridge on the line further east near the town of Kaspi. Russia denied Georgian accusations that it was behind the attack.

Oil exports were disrupted, but Azerbaijan said Georgia had offered a smaller, disused rail bridge for use until the damaged bridge was repaired.
This is how the Russians "evacuate" an occupied region where they were never supposed to be in the first place... they lay down mines upon leaving.  Perfectly normal though.  It is simply how the Russians say "farewell".  Russia destroys Georgia on the way in, and they destroy Georgia on the way out.  I've come to expect nothing less from the Evil Empire.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russian Checkpoints Continue to be Set Up Inside Georgia

A Russian military convoy, involving armored vehicles and trucks, withdrew from Georgia’s main military base in Senaki on Saturday morning and moved in the direction of breakaway Abkhazia.

Although the troops have pulled out from the town itself, Russian forces have maintained a stationary checkpoint just outside Senaki, controlling a key road intersection at the village of Teklati. The checkpoint controls the road to the port town of Poti and another one to Zugdidi and breakaway Abkhazia.

On August 22, Anatoly Nogovitsin, the deputy chief of the general staff of the Russian armed forces, said at a news conference in Moscow that the military airfield in Senaki would remain under the “zone of responsibility of the Russian peacekeeping forces” – suggesting that Russian troops would not give up control over the area.

Russian troops are also maintaining a checkpoint, supported by armored vehicles, at Nabada, just outside Poti.
And another illegal checkpoint setup by the peace-loving Russian army!  Everyone can relax now, Russia is on the scene and keeping the peace after their brutal invasion of our ally.  Thank God!  For a second there I thought the Russians were going to not keep the peace and not control the movement of all Georgians inside their own country.  Poti, Senaki; how many other checkpoints have gone up around the now-conquered nation of Georgia?  As I've said repeatedly over the past couple of weeks, the Russians will not leave unless they are forced to.  For all intents and purposes, Georgia now belongs to the Kremlin.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Russians Set Up Checkpoints in Georgia With Armored Vehicles

Civil Georgia, Tbilisi / 23 Aug.'08 / 14:52

Russian troops will patrol the Georgian port town of Poti, Anatoly Nogovitsin, the deputy chief of the general staff of the Russian armed forces, said at a news conference in Moscow on August 23.

He said the patrols would happen even though Poti was not in the “zone of security” – an area on the Georgian side of the Abkhaz administrative border, which is defined by the 1994 Moscow ceasefire agreement.

“Poti is not within the zone of security, but it does not at all mean that we will be sitting beyond the fence and just looking at how they [Georgian servicemen] drive Humvees; move munitions around in trucks. Are we supposed to just count them?” Nogovitsin said.

He said the patrols would be carried out from Russian military base camps outside Poti and Russian forces would “act in accordance with the existing situation on the ground.”

Russian troops have established a stationary checkpoint, supported by armored vehicles, just outside Poti.
The Russians have no intention of evacuating Georgia.  Instead, the Russians are digging-in and confiscating Georgian territory as they see fit.  The rest of the world sits by and defends our ally with harsh words hoping one day soon Vlad the Impaler Putin's feelings will get hurt so he will pick up his toys and go home where he belongs.  I think maybe it's time for a different strategy.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

CNN Reports: Obama's Brother Living in Nairobi Slum, and Doing Just Fine Thankyouverymuch

Doing their job as part of the liberal media's Obama campaign propaganda department, CNN tracked down George Obama who lives in a hut in a Nairobi slum in Kenya.  Even though Obama's brother lives in squalor and gets zero help from Barack, who himself is worth millions, the team of expert impartial crack-journalists at CNN are here to report that young George Obama is doing just fine living in a filthy disease-infested slum and fully supports Barack's campaign for President.  Also, George states clearly he wants no help from Barack because eating dirt in order to live is just dandy.
George Obama says he is sure his half-brother will win the U.S. presidency in November.
Obama's brother, happily standing in front of his hut

HURUMA, Kenya (CNN) -- We found Barack Obama's half-brother living in a Nairobi slum.

George Obama says he is sure his half-brother will win the U.S. presidency in November.

George Obama, whose birth certificate shows that he is Barack Obama's half-brother, lives in a small house in Huruma that he shares with his mother's extended family, far away from the presidential campaign circus.

In his memoir, "Dreams for my Father," the Democratic presidential candidate describes meeting George as a "painful affair." Barack Obama's trip to Kenya meant meeting family he had never known.

In the book, which is popular in Nairobi and can be found in almost any supermarket, Obama looks back at his personal story and his struggles to reconcile with a Kenyan father who left him and his mother when he was just a child.

Barack Obama Sr. died in a car accident when George was just 6 months old. And like his half-brother, George hardly knew his father. George was his father's last child and had not been aware of his famous half-brother.

"I think I wanted to learn about my father the same way he did," George Obama told me about why he read the book. "He came here searching for his roots, and I was also trying to find my roots."

Unlike his grandmother in Kogela, in Western Kenya, George Obama had received little attention from the media.

But reports surfaced in the past few days, springing from an Italian Vanity Fair article saying George Obama is living in a shack and "earning less than a dollar a day."

The reports left him angry.

"I was brought up well. I live well even now," he said. "The magazines, they have exaggerated everything.

"I think I kind of like it here. There are some challenges, but maybe it is just like where you come from, there are the same challenges," Obama said.

Obama, who is in his mid-20s, is learning to become a mechanic and is active in youth groups in Huruma. He said he tries to help the community as much as he can.

At least one of his neighbors feels that perhaps the candidate should help the brother.

"I would like Obama to visit his brother to see how he is living, to improve his way of life," said Emelda Negei, who runs a small dispensary near Obama's house.

But George Obama will have none of it. He draws inspiration from his famous half-brother. He acknowledges that he is biased but said he knows that his half-brother will be the next president.

"Because he wants to be [president]," he said. "I think in life, what you want is what you are supposed to get."
Yes America, there is absolutely nothing to see here.  No story at all.  As you can see above, George Obama thinks "in life, what you want is what you are supposed to get".  This statement is undeniably accurate given the fact poor George is as happy as a lark being a mule cart mechanic and living in abject poverty the likes of which the vast majority of you reading this will never see.  George Obama lives and scrapes out a horrid existence in the slums of Nairobi, therefore that is what he wanted and is exactly what he is supposed to get.  It should be obvious to you at this point there is no need for Barack to send his brother even thirty dollars and double poor George's income for the year.
 
CNN is to be commended for doing the country this great service in tracking down George Obama who is, in case you missed it, living the high-life in deprivation, destitution, and requires not one penny of help from his older brother running for President of the United States.  There is absolutely no way Jesus Christ was referring to people such as George Obama when he spoke the phrase, "the least among us".
 
So give Barack a break will you?  He already knew what you ignorant American voters who cling to your guns and religion did not.  You stupid people!  Have you no heart and soul?  Are you so far removed from understanding even your own Bible as to grasp the fact that George Obama living in a Nairobi slum is doing just fine and should actually be totally ignored by his older and extremely wealthy brother?
 
The only aid George Obama should be receiving is the encouragement and excitement bestowed upon him by the mere thought of Barack Obama being the next President of the United States.  Many have been known to easily survive on that alone.  Why should George be any different?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ukraine Vows Not to be Russia's Next Target

President of the Ukraine standing up to Russia?  Good!  Somebody besides Georgia's tiny 18,000-man army needs to.  Well, at one time it was at 18,000.  Now, who knows. The Communists have probably slaughtered half of them during the invasion just for existing. 
 
Yushchenko is making the right demands, especially after Moscow's threat of nuking his country and people back into the Dark Ages for attempting to defend themselves from Iranian missiles.  Roger Boyes in Kiev reports for the Times Online:
Viktor Yushchenko, the Ukrainian President, was in a fierce and defiant mood yesterday as he urged Nato to respond to the Russian invasion of Georgia by moving quickly to expand the frontiers of the alliance eastwards.

In an exclusive interview with The Times Mr Yushchenko asserted that the fundamentals of international politics had changed. Ukraine had to do everything in its power to ensure it was not going to be next on the Kremlin hitlist.

“It is the first time in Europe since the Cold War that a foreign army has entered the territory of a sovereign state without any internationally accepted legal basis,” he said.

“If we were to be ambivalent about this it would give tacit approval to put our country and our citizens under threat.”

The President — one of the figureheads of the Orange Revolution that toppled Moscow's favoured candidate for the leadership of Ukraine — was careful not to criticise Vladimir Putin, the Russian Prime Minister, directly.

Even when the 54-year-old economist flew to Tbilisi shortly after the outbreak of the Russian-Georgian war, his words were more carefully chosen than those of the other East European heads of state.

Russians form a strong minority in Ukraine — about 17 per cent of the population, in the east and to the south in the Crimea — and could become a flashpoint in any future confrontation with Moscow.

Yesterday was the eve of Ukrainian Independence Day and it was time for the President to break cover. Over the roofs of Kiev, a Ukrainian jet fighter howled through the sky. It was preparing for the celebrations, but its presence still induced a vague sense of menace.

This weekend the Independence Day festivities will have a martial edge. It is a good moment to display strength, although in truth the Ukrainian forces are a mere shadow of those of Russia, which is using oil money to modernise the army and boost military might. New aircraft carriers are planned, and new equipment across the board.

“Ukraine has to move towards the Nato alliance,” the President said, drumming up support before the Nato summit in December.

“It is the only way for our country to protect our national security and sovereignty. When the borders of Nato expand, so too does the region of peace and stability.”
The question remains:  Will NATO and the United States grow a spine and stand up to Russia's invasion of Georgia along with defending those who might be next on Vlad the Impaler Putin's list of targets ripe for the kill?  Given our treaty with Poland, which is direct and clear as to what we must do if they are attacked, Russia most likely won't mess with that particular country... other than using harsh language.  Ukraine on the other hand, I'm not so sure.
 
Russia is quite busy aligning itself with our enemies around the world; Cuba, Venezuela, Syria, Iran, China, and any other thug regime who will strike a deal with the Communists of the Soviet Union.  We had better make ourselves busy strengthening our own alliances with free nations, especially those who are directly threatened by Russia's march across Europe.  The United States has already sat by and watched Russia carve-up Georgia.  Do we stop it now, or watch another ally fall?  What is the exact number of allied nations that need to be invaded by Russia for us to act?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pakistan Army Aiding Taliban Attacks on Afghanistan

The silly game our government plays with Pakistan costs us the lives of our soldiers in Afghanistan.  While we are forbidden from attacking the Taliban and al-Qaeda on Pakistan's soil, the Pakistan military aids our enemies in their cross-border raids into Afghanistan where they assault U.S. bases and Afghan civilians.  The enemy gets to cross the border freely; we do not.  This is an obvious disadvantage our leaders have placed on our soldiers and it has prevented us from winning the war against the Taliban and al-Qaeda.
 
The enemy is able to recruit an endless supply of radicals in the regions they control in Pakistan, just across the border from our own areas of operation.  As long as we are not allowed to kill the Taliban and al-Qaeda where the live, at the source, the war in Afghanistan will go on forever.  We kill thousands of enemies, and they simply recruit more without us being able to lay a finger on their bases.
 
Our leaders agreed to this insanity so as not to upset the Pakistan governemnt who we are told is "one of our strongest allies in the War".  When you read or hear statements like those, know you are being lied to.  Here's why: 
Elements of the Pakistan army sent to ungoverned tribal areas on a mission to fight Islamic terrorists are instead helping the militants attack Afghanistan.

Two sources -- one a military officer who just returned from the war theater, the other a government source -- told HUMAN EVENTS rogue Pakistani military officers are aiding radical tribal leaders by providing training, as well as advice on tactics and how to procure weapons on the black market.

The military's help is an example of the mixed performance of U.S. ally Pakistan in the war on terror, and in particular the fight inside the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) where al Qaeda and the Taliban operate.Continued

The FATA has become a critical target in the U.S. war on al Qaeda. It is where Osama bin Laden is thought to be hiding. It is also where militants are trained to infiltrate Afghanistan and killed NATO and local forces in a campaign to topple the elected government of President Hamid Karzai.

"The Pakistani government and the military in particular are not monolithic," said a senior U.S. official. "In some areas, there's very good counter-terrorism cooperation with us. In other areas, there is plenty of room for improvement. There are elements within the government and military that might have some links to militant groups in the region. That is a matter of concern."

Nadeem Kiani, spokesman for the Pakistani embassy in Washington, took issue with reports of army-militant collaboration.

"We have not received any specific evidence of any military officer helping terrorists," Kiani told HUMAN EVENTS. "If we are provided specific evidence, we will take action."

He said there are now 120,000 soldiers in the FATA, about one-fifth of Pakistan's active duty army. Terrorists there have killed over 1,200 army soldiers and other security officials.

"If there was any collaboration of any sort to help the militants, you would not see these sorts of things against security officers," Kiani said. "The Pakistan army is very professional organization. It is one of the best armies in the world."

On the one hand, the government of Pervez Musharraf, a former top army general who resigned this week as Pakistan's president, dispatched army troops to the FATA for the first time in its history to combat al Qaeda, the Taliban and other militant groups.

But at the same time, some of the officers sent there have aided rather than fought the extremists, forming bonds that included attending religious services together, one of the sources said.

The officers are rogue, not acting at the behest of the government, the sources say. They are more loyal to the militant version of Islam than to the state.

The alliance is rooted in the Pakistan army's complex makeup. Some officers replicate the U.S. system of strict civilian control over the military. Others were loyal to Musharraf and helped him take power in 1999.

And then there are elements whose first loyalty is to Islam and the Koran, according to a military intelligence officer interviewed by HUMAN EVENTS.
Continue reading the article from Rowan Scarborough at Human Events by following the link above.  I would like for one of these so-called "experts" to show me an Islamist whose first loyalty is not to Islam. 
 
Of course we are told the situation is "complex" and that we should not mess around with the precarious balance of power in Pakistan which prevents a nation full of radicalized Islamists from controlling the government.  Well here's a newsflash:  Musharraf is out of a job!  The moderate element that used to be ruling the Pakistan government is no more.  The people of Pakistan had an election and believe it or not, democracy worked.  Islamic fascists rule the country of Pakistan and are in charge of the government, including the military.
 
In the areas where the Pakistan government is not in control, the Taliban and al-Qaeda are.  Specifically, along the Pakistan-Afghan border where our enemies launch attacks on our soldiers from relative safety.  Given the fact Musharraf is no longer in power, the idiotic deal we struck with Pakistan to prevent our military from doing their jobs is no longer in effect.  What's more, the Pakistan military has never really adhered to the rules of the agreement to begin with, as the report quoted above clearly shows.
 
At the very least, our side of the Afghanistan border with Pakistan should be sealed and security brutally enforced if we are not going to launch counter-attacks against our enemies on the other side.  Our soldiers know how to do their jobs, I suggest our leaders allow them to do just that.  It has been seven long years since the Taliban and al-Qaeda successfully attacked our country on our own soil on 9/11.  Whichever candidate is elected President, he needs to defeat the enemy across the border in Pakistan.  On top of that, a direct message should be sent to the Pakistan military concerning their aid to our enemies.  Stop playing games and win the damn war!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Joe Blowhard Biden Chosen by The Chosen One

My prayers have been answered!  Slow Joe Biden has been chosen as Barack Obama's running-mate:
Barack Obama is preparing to appear on stage Saturday afternoon with his running mate for the first time after announcing early in the morning that he had picked Delaware Sen. Joe Biden for the second spot on the Democratic presidential ticket.

The announcement ended days of frenzied speculation about who his vice president pick would be, with Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine and Indiana Senator Evan Bayh remaining strong contenders as late as Friday evening.

Hillary Clinton, Obama’s close rival throughout the Democratic primaries, also had been in the running for a spot on the ticket. She was not considered a leading candidate for the job, though Obama’s campaign still may need to overcome the lingering bitterness some of her supporters feel over the tenor and outcome of the primary race to court them in the general election.

Sen. Clinton was among the first to applaud Obama on Saturday for his choice.

“In naming my colleague and friend Senator Joe Biden to be the Vice Presidential nominee, Senator Obama has continued in the best traditions for the vice presidency by selecting an exceptionally strong, experienced leader and devoted public servant,” Clinton said in a written statement. “Senator Biden will be a purposeful and dynamic vice president who will help Senator Obama both win the Presidency and govern this great country.”

Former Clinton Communications Director and FOX News contributor Howard Wolfson said that, after Clinton, he thought Biden was “the best possible pick that Barack Obama could have made.”

“I think he brings a wealth of experience and he is a great campaigner and I think he is a very fine pick,” Wolfson told FOX News on Saturday.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid also expressed strong support for Biden.

“Joe Biden has been fighting his entire career for the change that Sen. Obama champions,” Reid said in a written statement. “He is a dedicated family man who has been an effective chairman of both the Foreign Affairs and Judiciary Committees, has been a sage voice on many of the toughest foreign policy issues of our time, and has long been a strong advocate for protecting American families and making our communities safer.”

Meanwhile, John McCain, Obama’s Republican rival for the presidency, plans to call Biden sometime Saturday today to congratulate his long-time senate colleague on his placement on the opposing ticket, a McCain aide told FOX News.

Biden, 65, has twice sought the White House, and is a Catholic with blue-collar roots, a generally liberal voting record and a reputation as a long-winded orator.
Team McCain responds to the news by launching a new campaign ad:
With the ink barely dried on the news Saturday morning that Barack Obama had chosen Joe Biden as his running mate, John McCain’s campaign released a TV ad using Biden’s own words against Obama.

In particular, the ad shows 2007 footage of an ABC debate with the Democratic presidential candidates in which Biden affirmed his belief that Obama is not ready to be president.

“You were asked, ‘Is he ready?’” the moderator, ABC’sGeorge Stephanopoulous, says to Biden. “You said, ‘I think he can be ready but right now, I don’t believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training,’”

“I think that I stand by the statement,” Biden responds, with Obama standing to his right on the stage.

The ad also shows Biden on a 2005 segment on “The Daily Show” saying, “I would be honored to run with or against John McCain, because I think the country would be better off.”
Apparently the "on the job training" which Barack Obama will so desperately require as President will be tutored by none other than the man who cautioned America to not do just that.  Can you imagine?  Barack Obama has put himself into the position of having to endure lecture after lecture after lecture from Blowhard Biden on every subject imaginable throughout his tenure in the White House.  I almost feel sorry for Barack on this one... almost.
 
Is there really any question as to which one of these men will actually be running the country if Obama is elected President?  No question in my mind that Biden will be in charge, and if not in charge he will surely be heard... and heard... and heard.  In fact, it's possible no one at all will be runnning the country if Obama is elected because they won't be able to get Biden to stop bloviating and blubbering long enough to actually do anything!
 
Now all we have to worry about is whether or not John McCain will actually be stupid enough to pick a pro-choice abortionist for his running-mate.  Surely not.  Then again, I was once sure the GOP was not stupid enough to pick John McCain as our nominee.  So really any possibility is on the table.
 
Do you realize if McCain picks a Senator as his running-mate the American voter will have only Senators to choose from for President this November?  We could be looking at idiots who came straight from our completely dysfunctional Senate as the leaders of our country for the next 16 years.  Almost unthinkable.  Our Senate has done more to hurt this country over the past two decades than any other group inside the country, aside from liberals in general that is.  If McCain wants to win, he had better pick a Governor or at least a Congressman.
 
As a sidenote, the Biden pick was obviously made to strengthen Obama's woefully lacking national security and foreign policy experience.  The fun part here is that while everyone in Washington might think Joe Biden is just great, the rest of the country sees him as a thoughtless baffoon.  A McCain-Romney ticket would destroy an Obama-Biden ticket on national security and foreign policy.  One down, one to go.  Let's hope McCain makes the right choice now that many of us have gotten what we wanted with Obama.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vlad the Impaler Putin, Student of History

From Ben Shapiro on August 18th, writing at Family Security Matters:
In 1939, Adolf Hitler wanted Czechoslovakia. He wanted it badly. There was only one problem: the Munich Agreements, signed by Hitler, Britain’s Neville Chamberlain, Edouard Daladier of France, and Benito Mussolini of Italy, guaranteed the survival of Czechoslovakia.

But Hitler had a strategy. He proceeded to foment separatist insurrections by two of Czechoslovakia’s provinces: Slovakia and Ruthenia. This put the Czechoslovakian government in a no-win situation. If the government squelched the rebellions, Hitler could march in and declare that it was the German mission to free Slovakia and Ruthenia. If the government allowed Slovakia and Ruthenia to secede, Hitler could claim that the Czechoslovakia guaranteed by Britain and France no longer existed – the rump state was, in fact, a different state than the Czechoslovakia discussed under the Munich Agreements.

The plan worked to perfection. The Czechoslovakian government responded to the threat of secession by dumping the Ruthenian and Slovakian governments on March 9-10, 1939. On March 14, 1939, Slovakia, threatened with invasion by Hitler, declared its independence. So did Ruthenia. Hitler staged anti-German “atrocities” in Czechoslovakia, then invaded it. “Czechoslovakia showed its inherent inability to survive and has therefore now fallen a victim to actual dissolution,” Hitler stated. “The German Reich cannot tolerate continuous disturbances in these areas …. Therefore the German Reich, in keeping with the law of self-preservation, is now resolved to intervene decisively to rebuild the foundations of a reasonable order in Central Europe.”

The West, as Hitler had predicted, did nothing. Chamberlain cited Slovakia’s independence as a reason for reneging on the Munich Agreements. “The effect of this declaration,” said Chamberlain, “put an end by internal disruption to the State whose frontier we had proposed to guarantee. His Majesty’s Government cannot accordingly hold themselves any longer bound by this obligation.”

And so Czechoslovakia ceased to exist. And so Hitler was emboldened to invade Poland. And so began World War II.

Vladimir Putin of Russia is clearly a student of history. His Georgian gambit bears all the hallmarks of a Hitlerian coup. He fomented secessionist unrest in South Ossetia, a northern province of Georgia. When the Georgian government intervened to put down the unrest, Putin sent in Russian troops to “protect” the Ossetians. He then used the opportunity to invade all of Georgia, taking control of swaths of territory.
Excellent piece from Ben Shapiro.  Continue reading at the link above.  The parallels and stark similarities are undeniable.  Vlad the Impaler Putin has engaged in every action described in Ben's article.  Don't think for a second there are many of us watching this unfold who are not thinking the exact same thing, though Ben Shapiro definitely put it together in a well-written and coherent comparison from our not-too-distant history.
 
Of course for liberals, who in their own minds have erased all history before 1960, Russia is simply "keeping the peace" in an aggressive country full of George Bush-loving barbarians.  The left's response to the Russian invasion of Georgia has been typically Communist.  If they had behaved any different, I would have been required to pinch myself for fear of dreaming.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive